Questions & Answers

I have received a number of questions. some are serious, some sublime

I wrote the below to help both myself and my family to understand our faith a bit better.  None of us should be anything just because. As St. Peter wrote in one of his letters. You should always be able to give a good reason for your beliefs.   This only makes logical sense.  If we can’t describe what we believe how can we actually say we believe it.  The failure of Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular is that we did not pass on the reasons for our faith. After a while saying well it just is… just isn’t enough.

One major issue that is helping destroy people’s knowledge and their faith is simply all of the various competing concepts and ideas. In general, the average person looks upon Christianity as all the same thing. Catholics, Lutherans, Evangelicals, Presbyterians etc. Christianity is looked at all of their talking as one voice. But it is hardly so.  We also live in an age where we know a whole bunch of stuff… never before in human history has the typical human known as much about science, math, philosophy, etc. etc. It truly is amazing and is truly good.  The lure and the impact that television has is immense. In the 1950’s on any given Sunday night you turned on one of maybe 5 stations. and most likely you tuned in to watch Bishop Sheen on TV. He spoke practically, He spoke reverently, He spoke truth. It didn’t really matter if you were Roman Catholic or not, everyone recognized him to be talking the word of God.   NBC had a hit on their hands and as TV grew other people joined into the foray. At first people Like Billy Graham. But more and more began to come to the airwaves and bring with it a very distorted message, because it was their message and not God’s message. Sure God was pointed to but very bad interpretations.

Then the Evangelists came. The “Prosperity Gospel” arrives to TV. If you have money God loves you… Send it to me and I will make you even more prosperous.  I am a man of God, but don’t mind me I am fooling around on the side with the money you sent and now I have a mansion to live in while I pray for you…. That put a large ding into religion in the US. The priest sex-abuse scandal did nothing to help.  Hypocrisy is seldom tolerated here or elsewhere usually.  Also a large problem was that many of these religious on TV talked about stuff that was either non biblical or simply made up. They claim to be men and women of Scripture… but listening to it you could only wonder which scripture are they reading?  No one in the 2500 years since Genesis was written down actually thought that the world was created in 6 human days. We all recognized it as God talking though the Scripture to help us understand that He created the world and gave it as a gift to humanity.  Yet here they are preaching on TV saying there is no doubt God made it in 7 days!!! But what about archeology? It doesn’t matter the Bible said so…. But what about simple math?  No the bible says so! 

Obviously you cannot be a Christian and believe in Science!!

Unfortunately, that is the concept that made it through!  However, the Catholic Church has always said reading the Bible by itself without it being informed by science, and other philosophical arts is dangerous.  This is the greatest fallacy that has stuck with our culture.  All you have to do is take a quick glance back at history to see priests, bishops, and Catholic scientists forming some of the world’s most influential theories and facts. 

Gregor Mendel – Augustinian Monk and father of genetics (remember those bean experiments we did in school?

Rev. Georges Lemaître –  Priest and Physicist at Catholic College of Lueven. Developer of the Big Bang theory. 

There are thousands more that are known and thousands and thousands more that are not. It is the pursuit of Truth that is at the heart of true religion. We have many ways or looking at God’s truth. Yes, there is scripture but it is definitely not the only way that God is talking to us.  Physics, Philosophy, poetry, etc. etc. Anyone that says ‘the bible is the only source of knowing God’ well is simply nuts! However, the Scriptures are exceedingly important.

We see from day one the recognition that God is talking to us through the scriptures. But not like a science book… perhaps it is in poetry, perhaps it is in the words of various prophets… but not in the way we think of history today. He never said on August 21, 1548 I was going to make a butterfly flap its wings. and cause the entire fleet of boats to be pushed away…. No he doesn’t talk to us that way. Because it is BORING and teaches us nothing about ourselves, others, or God!!  He talks to us through the heart. We always must remember that God made everything in the universe… including Science… It is another way to try to seek truth which is the point of religion.

At any time, you hear the words, “It says in the Bible that…… “be very careful because the Catholic Church will teach that it says in the bible this so it is telling us that we should act or care for or love like this.    Many others will say It says in the Bible this so the world is going to end on September 28, 2025. so in preparation please send $50 and I will build a rocket ship to send us to Mars. (Not knowing science they might be surprised as the difficulty in breathing on Mars).    Which one is Truth and which one are you going to hear about on the 6 pm news?

Since we only hear about the strange and unusual on the news… we continually hear religion= strange and wacky… So hopefully this will help clear up some of that. The goal of religion is TRUTH. And sometimes hearing the truth just isn’t real fun. Okay you think this way about yourself… however from where I sit I see this.  Close friends will say that to you simply because it is the truth and we need and yearn for the truth.  God is whispering in our ears the Truth… you will never hear God screaming at the top of his lung. So there are a few other things which should also be remembered.

A few things that have to be remembered at all times.

First things first a little Greek for us to consider. The word catholic is Greek. It means Universal. In other words, when we say the Catholic Church we are saying the Universal Church. What else would God establish?  Everyone can join the church however it is their responsibility to learn what the Catholic Church is all about. Everyone who is baptized with the words I baptize you in the name of the Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit are considered in the Church regardless of whether they consider themselves part of it. The Church is the Bride of Christ and does not force itself upon anyone, just as God does not force His way on anyone. The rules of the road are fairly easy since they are made by God as given in the Holy Bible. The source for everything is there. So let’s look really quickly at a few things that should be remembered at all times when looking at anything with the church.

  1. The Catholic church was created by God as a way to get every human being into Heaven. As such it must relate to every human being. Those in the United States (new comer in the history of things) To Ethiopia, Australia, Russia, Japan, South Africa Chile Italy, etc.  In this there are tons of cultural diversity within the Church. A Mass in Uganda will go through the exact same Liturgical steps (Greeting, Readings, Gospel, Holy, and Eucharist, The sending) but will have an entirely different feel than that of a Mass in Denver. It is this diversity which is embraced and loved within the Church. This is how it has over 1 billion “members” throughout the world
  1. The Catholic Church for the first 1500 years was the only Church. Christ founded the Church and it has continued to flourish for about 2000 years.  Around the years 1450 and on came the Protestant Revolt. At that particular time this is when we began all sorts of new things (some good, some not so good, some neutral)
  1. We are used to being in the United States of America which was populated by Europeans around 1650 or so. This is 1650 years after the Catholic Church was established. If we remember our history we remember the Pilgrims having a hearty meal on the east Coast with some Indian friends…. Well perhaps it didn’t come off exactly like that. But very pertinent to our American story is who founded us… The Pilgrims or as we know of them today, The Puritans, the Scots Irish (now known as the Presbyterians), the Quakers and the Calvinists. Ever wonder why we are such a somber nation? Dancing has historically been frowned on?  Drinking abhorred? Hmm take a look at some of the rules that the four groups above have These four groups also have a Congregationalist mentality. Basically what their individual group votes to be true is true and good regardless of source. Keeping this in mind helps explain many of the attitudes and though processes that influence American lives regardless of religious affiliation.
  1. The Government of the Catholic Church is based upon the Roman Hierarchy. And that is nothing like what we are used to in America. The Roman empire was a very complicated (yet very simple “don’t piss off da man”) structure. To look at the structure of the Catholic Church is similar but in names only (Yes there were deacons in the Roman government but held a very different role) Where the Roman Emperor was King he was also God. The Pope who holds a similar position obviously does not consider himself God.   This topic is a topic that whole semesters can be written on and has been done. Unfortunately, most who write on it have a political agenda they are working from so it is very difficult to get a clear idea.  There are numerous histories of the Roman Catholic Church that do okay with it, but it is a very difficult thing for us in 2000’s to get in touch with people from this age.  One mistake we do make is in thinking that these people knew very little about science or the world at large. We get the impression that they knew little because we had to relearn everything after the “dark ages (i.e. the fall of the Roman Empire and the invasion by the Mongols and Goths, etc. These invaders destroyed the vast majority of books and much of western knowledge. The Church in Rome, Alexandria, Constantinople etc. kept what it could but between the hoards and fires we lost a whole lot of information. Most everything we know today was already known by the Greeks and Romans. Obviously we expanded the information… but getting down to the basics. We virtually had to relearn everything. Quite the shame actually.

Also important to understand is that each diocese runs itself in day to day operations so to speak. Bishop Thomas Olmstead is the “Pope” of Phoenix. However, he runs the diocese in union with Pope Francis.  Pope Francis (talking politically) is in charge of the Dogma, Doctrine, Catechism of the Catholic Church. It is probably surprising to most people what is a Dogma or Doctrine of the Church and what is not. But Bishop Malloy in Rockford has as much say in how the Diocese of Rockford is run as Pope Francis has in how the Diocese of Rome is run.

  1. Just a few definitions. Most people have a completely wrong idea on most of these.
    1. The twelve. These are the 12 who were picked by Jesus himself to be leaders of the Church at its beginning.  Why 12? Simple it is a number that means government if you will.  There were twelve tribes of Israel, 12 Judges etc. etc. Jesus continues His theme throughout the history of the world. The Bible references “the Twelve” when speaking of Peter James, John, Andrew etc. etc.
    2. Apostle This term means those sent. Most people think that there were just the 12 Apostles. not so. Those are “the Twelve” There are many Apostles. Look at the story of the “Sending of the 72” (Luke 10) As the name of the story implies these 72 were apostles… those sent. Anyone who is sent is an apostle. Just a little teaser… what do you think is meant at the “end” of Mass when it is said “Go in Peace to love and serve the Lord”?
    3. Disciple: A student. Every master has their students. Everyone on the Mount or the Plain was a disciple of Jesus when they heard His sermon. You are a disciple of your boss assuming you are trying to learn from them. At school you were disciples of you teachers. You were trying to learn from them. Again many people use this term incorrectly when they talk about the 12 Disciples… They were not the only ones being taught by Jesus.

this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Questions About God

Ahhh a double sided question right off the bat. Well let’s look at the question and try to define it a bit better. Society is a grouping of people. Might be two people or it might be the entire society of humanity.  Jesus. So from the wording of this question I would have to assume that by Jesus you mean the version of Jesus that came to earth 2000 (roughly) years ago. This part is the tricky part.  We as human beings reference what we know (this is natural) We equate Jesus here on earth as the same as any other human being. But at the same time we think of Jesus as God as this spirit realm up in heaven. But in Jesus there is both. Jesus when he was physically here on earth was both fully man and fully God. How this worked is far above my knowledge but it was. The next issue is that when the resurrection occurred we note many differences between his now glorified body.

We believe that when we die our soul goes to the next realm and that at the Final judgement that our bodies will join with us again.  This was shown through the reality of Jesus after his resurrection. He was able to appear and walk through doors, but yet says I am not a ghost give me some fish. Reading through the Gospels we see there are many similarities to our human body, but there are many differences as well. The big question here is does Jesus\ human body (as we talk about it) even exist anymore?

But God is God and if it were His will Jesus could re-appear.

So let us look at times when this may have actually occurred… huh????? Well He is God. So let’s see what society has done with the times He has come down to earth again. So how many times have you heard in your life of Jesus coming back to earth?  I am going to bet zero. Yet He apparently has come back to earth numerous times.  As a matter of fact, we just celebrated the Lady of Guadalupe. (if you are not familiar what this is look it up… there are tons and tons of information on this event from 1531.  Mary appeared to a man named in Tepeyac Mexico. Mary was viewed as pregnant. Who was she pregnant with. Jesus obviously.

Margaret Mary Alacoque had a vision of Jesus in which she learned of the “sacred Heart of Jesus” which was officially recognized by about 75 years after her death.  These are of course Private Revelation which may be accepted or not accepted by the individual.  The last of the public revelations (which we are bound to believe) ends with the Death of john the Evangelist.

 

I say this to somewhat frame the question. Would society recognize Christ if he were to comeback the same way as he did 2 millennia ago and just show up around the age of 30. Keep in mind this I don’t believe could happen (other than by God’s will) simply because He (Jesus/God) stated he would not come again until the end of days and that his earthly body has already become glorified. God cannot break his own rules, buy his very nature

So let’s take a look at what might happen. Today there is about 1.8 – 2.0 million Christians on this world. So roughly 1/3 of the population claims Christianity.  These people are human beings, all sinners, and all mostly focused on one thing the same as the other 4 billion people… themselves. Let’s face it look at the actions of people and indeed human beings are focused generally on themselves.  When you do see someone genuinely focused on others it is evident. They have an “otherness” So let us look to the world today in light of the world of 2000 years ago, when Jesus was actually here on earth.

Jesus, Mary & Joseph when he was just born went to the temple for the Presentation.  This was a prescribed “rule” of Judaism. For the mother to be purified (after childbirth) and for the first born to be offered up for God. We read that two people recognized Him as Jesus Son of God. Two people both of whom had a very close relationship with God. Did the priests at the Temple recognize him? Did all of the other people that were there recognize him? No, only two people. One of which, his life had been now completed, who now knows all there is to know. And another holy woman who recognizes Him.  But of the thousands of other people there? There were always people at the Temple. It was the central hub of Judaism. but yet only two recognize him.

The next time we see Jesus at the temple it is for Passover at the age of 13. He is in the Temple reading and teaching with authority. The priests are amazed! Some of them possibly recognized him, but most did not.  The family of three were ordinary. This appears obvious. If the glory of God had shown off of them people would have noticed something at least.  But there is no real mention of the three of them ever getting any notice.

Now we fast forward 17 years, Jesus works his first miracle… At Cana he turns water into wine.  The servants fill up the water jugs (probably about 30 gallons or so) with water. And the chief wedding steward gives credit to the groom. The servants saw what happened, but no record is made of them saying anything. So we have an entire wedding party with few if any recognizing Jesus and what he did.

Phillip finds his companion Nathaniel and tells that he has found the Messiah… and Nathaniel’s response What good can come from someone that came from Nazareth? Well Phillip brought Nathaniel to Jesus and Jesus obviously said to Nathaniel what he needed to hear, for then he recognized him as God.  This pattern happens again and again and again.  How many other fishermen would have been mending their nets when Peter and Andrew found Jesus? How many other tax collectors were there when Levi son of Alpheus was called?

There were a few leaders that believed, but obviously not all of them. Some Pharisee recognized him, but most led with the belief that there is no way Jesus could be the Messiah. These were leaders who are supposed to know. People not looking for such a thing in their day to day life… probably accepted that.

We look to humanity today. And we realize that mankind hasn’t changed much. Sure technology has changed but we do the exact same things. Before television, there was radio, there were books, there were scrolls.  There were movies, there were pictograms, there was vaudeville, there were plays.  And there were still the same seven deadly sins that keep us today from true life and true love.   Would society believe today? Based on the above…. I think you can see the answer.  There would be some, those who are looking for truth and God. Those that have a true want to know God. they would recognize. But for those who are luke-warm or don’t care.. they would have the opportunity but would probably fail to recognize what they had. It is a shame, since God manifests himself all the time to people through all of the natural ways given to us as gifts. I think of the story of Eli on the mountain.  (1Kings 19:11)

 

Then the LORD said: Go out and stand on the mountain before the LORD;* the LORD will pass by. There was a strong and violent wind rending the mountains and crushing rocks before the LORD—but the LORD was not in the wind; after the wind, an earthquake—but the LORD was not in the earthquake; after the earthquake, fire—but the LORD was not in the fire; after the fire, a light silent sound.*

When he heard this, Elijah hid his face in his cloak and went out and stood at the entrance of the cave. A voice said to him, Why are you here, Elijah?

We are here to learn and to love.

Ahhhh one of the quintessential questions in metaphysics. According to Merriam Webster, Metaphysics is a division of philosophy that is concerned with the fundamental nature of reality and being and that includes ontology, cosmology, and often epistemology (2) :  ontology 2 b :  abstract philosophical studies:  a study of what is outside objective experience

 

Okay I suppose we could make this simpler, reality as defined outside of the physical realm.  Using it along with the physical realm to come to grips with what we see, hear, feel etc.… Not a precise definition but will put us on our way to answering this question.  As the root of this question is God’s omnipotence, or all-powerfulness. His power is infinite, so it would seem that he could make a burrito hot enough… but He also would be infinitely powerful enough to eat it… so as with any equation that revolves around infinity… it goes on and on therefore in the finite world somewhat of a useless question.

 

But the inferred question here also is would he make a burrito so hot that it could not be eaten?   Our understanding of God and how he works gives us some clues and it comes down to our interpretations of this.  Let us look back to our Metaphysical understanding of the creation of the world. From our human perspective, God created the world we know out of nothing, he made man (and women) in his own image, He gave us freewill. Human kind fell into sin, God promised a redeemer.  Notice no issues of time, but the truth of the basics of God’s creation of the Earth.

 

So we need to make some logical expressions here.

  • God made the world and he made man in the world. Man and the world must go together somehow.

 

  • After man rejected God’s command and fell into sin, God did not reject man, but let man continue and promised a redeemer.

 

  • If he put man into the world and promised a redeemer, God must love man and desire his/her best for them.

 

  • Man/Woman are made in God’s image and likeness and had the ability to reject God and fall into sin. They must have free will as it is apparent that fallen man is not the desire of God.

 

From this God loves man. But a true love cannot be forced. I cannot force you to love me, it is only through mutual love and desire for the best that one can love. Within humanity we love the best for the other human. There is no personal gain to be had. Obviously this is the optimum, none of us love the best for the other without personal gain at first. There is always something that is desired in return. But in the case of a marriage the man and woman work together for the best of the other. We consider the best for the other to be with God in heaven and we can assert that God’s desire is for us to be with us in heaven.

 

But because love cannot be forced it must be only with free will that we love God. God we know already loves us. But we can make a choice. We can either love Him or we cannot love Him.  He cannot force Himself upon us for that would be kind of the equivalent of rape (forced love). So since that does not include the good, it cannot be God. This means that God must humble himself and recognize that while He loves each and every one of us, it must be up to each of us whether to love him back. This is the concept of freewill.  Again we see Him humble himself in the incarnation of the God-man named Jesus.

 

          From Philippians Chapter 2

Do nothing out of selfishness or out of vainglory; rather, humbly regard others as more important than yourselves each looking out not for his own interests, but [also] everyone for those of others.

Have among yourselves the same attitude that is also yours in Christ Jesus,

 

Who, though he was in the form of God did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness;

 

and found human in appearance, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross.

 

We read elsewhere, He became like us, so that we could be like Him.  He humbled himself and through our own freewill we accept Him or not accept Him. He does not show his power nor does he force us into anything.

 

So the Catholic answer to the question is No he would not make a burrito so hot that he couldn’t eat it, simply because it would not allow our freewill to remain intact. We have a humble God who allows His creatures to accept Him or reject Him. Notice Jesus never wrote a book, but asked us to write what he did and that allows us to either accept Him or Reject him.  He is the redeemer that was promised in Genesis, but we still have our freewill to make that choice.

 

Freewill is mostly a Catholic virtue.  With the advent of the Protestant Revolution back in the 15th century The answer to the burrito question, using their Metaphysics, would be Yes it is possible. Their dependence upon predestination or Deist approaches obliterate the function of freewill. For one cannot be predestined and have free will… they are simply opposite of each other, hence why the answer becomes opposite.

 

Freewill allows us to love one another, love God and even allows us to grow in his righteousness. But in allowing us this freedom, God humbles himself and shows his true love for each of us.

 

Okay for this you will pay. Having to listen and watch a Joan Osbourne video, that was low (I am kidding !!!!). But these are the crosses we must bear.  Well where does one start on this. It is a cute song it hits some of the very very high points of theology.  There is a God and he cares. There are references to Jesus, the saints, the Pope, but never made the ultimate connection. The main message that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John said.

Most people look at the Gospels and look at them as stories about Jesus.  That is not the point and hearing stories is not “good news” which is what the word Gospel means.   Sure it points to individual good news about a particular story… but why are these four books called Gospels? What is the good news? Perhaps looking at the major thematic of each Gospel

Mark… Keeping the Messianic secret… The reader understands but not the ones inside the gospel

Matthew Showing fulfillment of the Scriptures – Proof of the messiahship

Luke: Fulfillment of God’s plan – God’s plan from the beginning

John:  Eternal life – Jesus was no mere man

A look into Jewish thought was that the Messiah was going to come and bring (basically)

  1. all of the 12 tribes of Israel together again
  2. Restoration of the Kingship of David and Solomon
  3. Rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem through Levi
  4. Ushering of the new age to come.

Looking at the four gospels we see that all of these are fulfilled. We look to other books, i.e. Letter to the Hebrews and we see a Talmudic (a specific type) reasoning of Jesus Messiahship.  Through Paul’s letters we see how that is to be applied to one’s life and those around them

The great news of all of this information and all of this is that

          Jesus was a man born through Mary and remained sinless

          Jesus was God.

So did he accomplish what the prophets and the seers said the Messiah was going to do?

Jesus established the Catholic Church… meaning the Universal church… He established it throughout the entire world, which necessarily includes the 12 tribes… as well as the gentiles

Restoration of the Kingship of David… He was of the line of David (as shown by the genealogies and He became King of the World by humility and kindness

Rebuilding of the temple. He said he would rebuild the Temple in three days. Friday… Saturday… Sunday… The Temple was rebuilt in His overcoming of death and his resurrection.   There was no more need of a physical temple as His body (the church) was established forevermore

          Ushering in the New age. The kingdom of God is at hand.

So what if God was one of us? Well He is, he was, he ever shall be. He came down from Heaven, experienced life as we live it with the exception of sin.  He gave us His way. On the road to Emmaus he explained how all of the scriptures spoke of Him and how we can and should follow him.  He understands man’s temptations, and he understands pain.  We (humanity), through the worst that man can be, showed Him up close and in person. Because he was righteous we killed him… but because he loved us he rose from the dead and established his Kingdom here forever.  The concept of the Incarnation is so powerful and so very very important.  And it is up to us to get it right.

Questions About Humanity

One reason and one reason alone. We are made in the image and likeness of God.  We are made holy. Our bodies are part of the Temple that was spoken of above. We are each one of God’s masterpieces.  To be holy is to treat holy.  Those things which we hold as holy we should treat as holy.  The human body does not cease being holy simply because it dies. Remember that the body was created by the mother, the Father and God. And is unique. No other will ever be exactly like him/her.

The body should be treated as any other holy object. Buried in holy ground. We don’t just take the ashes from the blessed palms and throw them into the garbage. We burn them, bury them within sacred ground.

So it is with the human body. We treat it with the dignity it deserves. It is loved by God, cherished by God. We can bury the body in its whole or it can be cremated and the remains placed into a holy place.

The world as a whole tends to treat every human being as all the same. One mass of humanity to devour and take every last bit of. It takes all that is valuable and exchanges it for temporal things. Computers, guitars, houses, buttery pancakes with syrup on top…  the world (full of sin and despise for man) works to destroy all that is.  As so honestly said somewhere “You can’t take away my dignity” This is true when we are alive… it should be equally true when death occurs.

To be treated dignified… one isn’t thrown out of a car window bouncing along the side of the rode. Can you imagine doing that to Mom when she passes? Why not? Because of her inherent dignity which she deserves.  Is there a difference between throwing her out the door of a car and throwing her out of a plane?

But fortunately the actual document from the CDF is not that long and says much more eloquently and beautifully what is being said and reiterated…. I have placed this in the appendix of this letter.

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Questions About Daily Life

Well in reality the North Star is up in space about 434 light years away. It is part of the Constellation of Ursa Minor. If you look at the constellation as a whole it appears from our vantage point that it points to the north. As usually perspective is everything. Like all the other constellations it is moving away from us and the stars that make up the constellation will appear to move closer or farther away. In a million years will it still appear to be pointing north? Doubtful, but I would check with an astro-physicist on that (Maybe Steven Hawkins if he would stop playing politics long enough to answer). 

 

But it does for the people of this age and since humans were created, an ability to find some directionality in the dark is a benefit.  Let’s face it once you know one of the compass points you can figure out the rest.  It happens that this star is one of the brighter in the sky helps also. But does it point north? No the stars that make up this constellation are further away, some closer and overall from space would just look like one in a billion billion specks of light.

 

But this brings up another question. Pontius Pilate asked Jesus “What is Truth” Well we must ask the question “What is North?” Are we looking at the North Pole or are we looking on a compass for Magnetic North. Did you know magnetic north changes all the time and is moving? Recently magnetic north passed from Canadian waters to Siberian land space. Thankfully the Polar axis doesn’t move… or does it? It does appear that what we know as the South Pole was in fact North and the North South… oh me oh my…. And we can combine that with the way our Northern magnetic pole works it is really a south pole of a magnet… Oh geez… so our north pole acts as a South Pole while it moves around and attracts compass needles while thankfully the North Axis pole stays in place, although occasionally changes place with the South Pole and makes it South… All this while the North Star points gleefully towards the well nothing since it is in reality a star emitting light rays 434 light years away… So what was your question?

Well This is definitely one of those Open ended questions. Camels are the real? Camels in the Bible? Camels taste good on the T-Zone?

 

Well let’s take a look at camels. not a very attractive animal but then again neither is a donkey but they sure get the job done don’t they?  They are the perfect workhorse out in the desert. Just the right amount of fuzz to keep themselves cool a storage system for water can take a load of stuff to where you want to go. Let’s face it, if you were going to design a pack animal for the dry locations like desert and rocky sand areas couldn’t really do much better.

 

As an FYI:

  • Scientific name: Camelus
  • Lifespan: Dromedary: 40 years
  • Speed: 40 mph (Maximum, In Short Bursts, Running)
  • Height: Dromedary: 5.9 – 6.6 ft.
  • Gestation period: Dromedary: 15 months, Bactrian camel: 13 months
  • Mass: Dromedary: 880 – 1,300 lbs, Bactrian camel: 1,000 lbs

Well I think I am going to rephrase your question to “What is the most holy creature on earth” Animal has with it many connotations that exclude so much. Creature would be anything that is on the earth and would even include anything outside of the earth. Creature includes homo sapiens, angels, demons, virtually anyone/thing in the universe. The word animal excludes so many things.

Holy is also an interesting word. The Latin word for Holy is “Sanctus” the Greek word for Holy is “άγιος” or hagios. This really means set apart or otherness.  Think about someone you might consider holy and there is a “otherness” about him or her. So much here depends on context. For you made a specific context in the question when you used “Earth” by which I assume you mean the planet upon which we reside as opposed to just the land. So it is fairly obvious that using scientific knowledge and the evolving information made by looking into the genome that at some point all of the animals which we know of came to be. I am not really sure how long this took… probably over millions of years and quite possibly as we learned about in school with natural selection and metamorphosis. Note here I used the world animal. For that much seems clear that the animals seem to have been created and then through various means came to be the rabbits, the tigers, the lions etc. that we know today.  This does not appear to be the case for humanity. There is no doubt that on the Earth the most advanced and otherness belongs to mankind. The homo sapien.  What is perhaps most interesting is that as the work in the human genome continues, the “source” of humanity appears to be one male and one female “getting together” years ago and spreading their own unique kind. In all manner of information Science is proving the basic roots of creation. We heard for years about the “missing link” … But based upon current science there doesn’t seem to be a link. Human beings just seem to have appeared.  One can read into this quite a bit. but there really does not appear to be any equal to mankind anywhere on earth.  There is the “hagio” iness or “otherly”-ness. It truly does appear that mankind has been “set apart” by definition holy of the other creatures. Now we can begin to layer upon this the religious and metaphysical layers of Made in the image and likeness of God, that is not apparent in other animals. Though it is believed that all creatures and plant life etc. was “Made” by God there may be no definite way in which we can define how these were “made”.  However, in the case of homo sapiens, we were made by the union of a single male and a single female homo-sapien. This seems apparent by current science, studying the genome. Perhaps later science will determine the origins of the other variant animals, but since mankind is fairly universal in their pride, the science continues to pursue mankind’s lineage first. So taking all of this into account. There really can be no other answer to the most “holy” of animals on the earth and that would be man. Within the known scientific workings there is none more set apart and would be viewed as holy than mankind.  Throughout the entire spiritual and physical world, we add in the various hosts of Angels, Demons, and then from our view there is the one that created all of it… that which began the creating from nothing and that is what would be referred to as God.  Those Spheres are at least at this time unable to be studied in physical ways. So we can talk of those spheres but only metaphysically. Leading us to conclude inconclusively how they are set-apart and their “otherness” Man is unique. Man is set-apart by study, by thoughts, by fears, by emotions, by senses. By thoughts of hope, faith and charity. Mankind is holy.

The reality is that we cannot know the before any more than we can know the future. Basically the question what was there before there was…. Is unanswerable.  The only thing that is known as “In the beginning there was …??? The description of what was basically nothing. Yet the description describes something that was. God is all time and all things. So in the beginning there was God. We accept that there was nothing for at some point there must have been a point where there was simply nothing. Yes, we know something did indeed happen because we are now here….

Reverse the time frames bit by bit to see the effect of atom on another atom… eventually you get back to a time where there was simply nothing.  Everything awaits the “prime mover” This prime mover or what we refer to as God caused an event. Perhaps one perhaps trillions…But there is no way in which we can ever know simply because how can you measure nothingness. By bringing a micrometer into the equation… you have now just broke the definition of nothingness.  The same goes with time….one cannot get to a point before time. By being there… there would have to be time for us to deal with the situation.

Man’s greatness is in speculation that there is more to be found out. A pull to know more and more. This is the yearning that man has had from its beginning. To know the ways of his/her creator. We are hopeful that all will be revealed when we “see Him as he really is”.  To look before or after takes unto the realm of timelessness which we don’t know the rules… it is a completely foreign thought not having time.  We can imagine time travel… but timelessness? The point where all things happen at the same time? The query itself is baseless since the very question is based in time.

One thing that struck a note to me on this is a discussion on toys and games by Chesterton. Something along the lines of this, That which mankind does work he is accomplishing something important. Seeing his way closer to God in one form or another. But all else is simply fun and games. There is no real benefit from gong to Mars the effort and time, money etc. Perhaps we learn something new about the physical universe… but what real good does it do… it is just fun and games.  We have so much to learn here and now… why are we looking elsewhere and other times.   Perhaps it is interesting, but in the end just man playing games.

Questions About Dave

Would the Benedictines let me in? Well I guess the most obvious answer would be beer and pretzels… but that would be the obvious one… Since it is a cooler area I would want something substantial, but yet something that would keep. So I look to the traditional German fare and thing nah… too hard… and create homemade fresh noodles and of course can play with the names a bit… maybe Reverend Ravioli, Father Fettuccini, or my favorite Benny’s Butter Noodles. But that is me.

 

Interestingly there is the Ludwig der Bayer Restaurant in Ettal, Bavaria.  The Ettal Basilica Monastery, Parish, and Pilgrimage Church is the Closter hotel and restaurant.  From here comes the funds that support the monastery as well as the programs that they run.  The reviews look decent… but you can never tell with internet reviews always some 12-year-old who decides he wants to be known for something like giving horrible reviews.

 

The Benedictine’s were formed in the early 500’s. They have been known for 1500 years for work and prayer as well as spreading the Gospel through their actions. I would imagine their food to be awesome. I am not really a big fan of German food (quie possibly because I have never had the real thing) but I bet they create, serve and love every one of their dishes and make each of their guests feel loved as well.

 

Well based on the previous answer no not just alright… in fact he is my closest friend. Let’s see the current wording is once again intentional disciple for the Lord.   That works kind of says it all. At least as best as human words can take it. Intentional… well it is on purpose that I am being a disciple. And it is of Jesus Christ that I want to go on learning from and being an adopted son.  Because we are adopted brothers and sisters of Christ… we are therefore sons and daughters of God.  

 

The love that emanated from God and from Jesus Christ and from the Holy Spirit cannot be described. We use terms such as Son of God which does not mean a child of. God and Jesus are one and the same but we can look see feel and talk to him. He is fully God and fully man. Impossible for us to get our little minds around. But it is only in this way that God and humanity can join together and become one.  We become one by being in Heaven and that is our goal. That is our goal for every other man woman and child in the world.  This is called union with God and community with others. It is simply a big family God, Jesus and his spouse the Church and all of us.  Not a bad sounding end.

 

So he is much more than just alright… he is all there is, all there has been and all that ever will be. One of the last words of the Bible (in the book of Revelation or Apocalypse (One is Latin for reveal the other is Greek for… well reveal) is I am the Alpha and Omega… The beginning and end of the Greek alphabet (John wrote in Greek btw). In the beginning there was the Word… that word is that which spoke for God as He was god… and He is the end as he will judge the living and the dead.    But unlike the judges we know from here on earth He is the just judge. He is Truth.

 

There are a number of ways of going about answering this. I think I am going to take a pathway in answering this that is quite outside the lines.

I want to take a look at life in terms of viewpoints. Let’s take a look at each of us being born. What are we at that point? Everything in the entire world (which consists of very little) revolves around us. We are dependent upon everyone and everything else. We are to the extreme possible narcissistic aren’t we?  We don’t have feelings other than a bond between our parents and us… everything I want is food, sleep, and diaper changing, though even that probably mom and dad want that more.

Most of our first few years are in that state. I want, I need, I, I , I…. That is until the one day when you meet someone else your own age. I mean look at a toddlers face when they first realize there is someone else in the world like them… it is a face of confusion. There are these tall people who give me everything and now there is this other thing that is similar to me? Then a sort of realization sets in. This is so cool.. someone else it like me! Same height, same chubby face, We should sit down and talk…hmmm take a memo…

Slowly as time goes on, while the child’s parents will always be #1, they become a ever smaller and smaller part of their child’s life.  Its not huge or dramatic… so maybe now instead of 100%, their parents are now 99.9999%. But as time goes on its 95%, then 90% By the time High school comes around, parents are maybe 50% sometimes less.  Taking up this void is the various relationships that are to be had. Friends, co-workers, deeper relationships.

This is what we are. Human beings are social creatures. We begin as almost anti-social and turn, learn, grow into a social creature. Some might be extroverted, some introverted, others a combination. But we love relationships. But why is this? This is what we are put on earth for. To form relationships. With other people, other creatures. Ever wonder why the drive to find alien life?  It is the drive for relationship. It is the same with God.

Our urge is to have a relationship with God. We come to the realization one day that yes Mom and Dad put the physical process to me, but God “formed me in the womb” and is each of our ultimate creator. He infused the soul, He gave us life.

But having a relationship with God, is certainly not like any of our other relationships. We are used to dealing with man’s fallen nature. So we snipe at our ex-boyfriend/girlfriends.  Tommy over there certainly turned a bit too something for me… How can he call me a friend when he just stole…?  This is what we are used to. This is our nature as well..

We do things and we suddenly realize… aww man… that just isn’t right…. Now of course that might not stop us… but we do realize it. That is called a conscience. But why is it we do these things that we don’t want to do? This is a very basic question which Paul asks in his letter to the Romans. So what is the answer? Why is it that we all want to do good… but when we want to do good we end up doing evil? It is that same answer we have heard, but not really listened to it.  It is sin that has its grip on us. 

What I do, I do not understand. For I do not do what I want, but I do what I hate.

Now if I do what I do not want, I concur that the law [Torah]  is good.

So now it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.

For I know that good does not dwell in me, that is, in my flesh. The willing is ready at hand, but doing the good is not.

For I do not do the good I want, but I do the evil I do not want.

Now if [I] do what I do not want, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.

So, then, I discover the principle that when I want to do right, evil is at hand.

For I take delight in the law of God, in my inner self,

but I see in my members another principle at war with the law of my mind, taking me captive to the law of sin that dwells in my members.*

Miserable one that I am! Who will deliver me from this mortal body?

Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Therefore, I myself, with my mind, serve the law of God but, with my flesh, the law of sin.m

So that is the explanation used by Paul and the one used for about 4500 years and Even before the time of Israel it was known, we hear it talked about in older cultic religions from throughout the world. The Greek language really works well for this phenomenon. In Greek it is ἁμαρτία hamartia It simply means “missing the mark” Think of a bullseye… you didn’t hit it.. you missed the mark….Kind of a great way to keep things in perspective.  We know we are going to sin but we strive to minimize that sin… get closer and closer to that bullseye.

So it appears that this is the human condition, and it is… the cause, obviously no scientific research can be done on this since it is abstract. But we know it is there. Somehow someway pride avarice, lust, gluttony, envy, sloth and anger are there. I tend to think of the concept of the creation theories is correct… that pride welled up and we rejected the good to get what we thought should be ours. We grabbed at it and we have all suffered since. Something metabolically changed in all of us.

The what happened is not nearly as important as the “something happened” and sin entered into the world.  So there is a reality that is not going to change. We have to recognize the point and meet it head on. This is one of the marvel of Catholicism.  We don’t hold back reality.  Human beings suck at times and we don’t pretend that it doesn’t happen. We acknowledge that when we hurt someone it affects all of the others and when we repent it affects all of the others.  I have heard many speak about sin as just something that happens and it has no effect… they try to sweep it under the rug and pretend it isn’t there… But they forget about the hurt it causes and we see the effects of trying to sweep hurt under the rug… How many billions of dollars are spent on psychiatry to find the root cause it simply an underlying sin that was brushed off and deemed unimportant. They aren’t unimportant in anyway, simply because they are very very personal.

So as Paul mentioned above, our goal is to be good. We strive for goodness. We know that also. We want to do good, we know when we miss the mark and we feel crappy about it. This feeling lasts for most things a second or so… For those real big screw-ups, it will last for years, decades, until they get resolved.  Some can’t be resolved here and those things lay on our conscience unresolved until we bring them to someone for Remission or redemption. In the Catholic world this is confession and is quite honestly the most brilliant thing about Catholicism.   We believe that Christ has already redeemed us for of sins, but we have to acknowledge them in order for remission.  When you have an argument with a friend… doesn’t it always feel so much better when you say I am sorry I screwed up, please forgive me?  That is the purpose… acknowledging to God that we screwed up… we missed the mark… We wanted to do good, but we didn’t. God doesn’t shoot you with lightning bolts, he is like the good father, who says ‘I know you have messed up… it is taken care of… here have a life-saver’

So if our goal is to be good, how do we go about doing that? Something in our life has to guide us, in a general sense.   That appears to be our vocation. Most people today think of this a job… but that isn’t accurate.  I think because of vocational schools in the 50’s the general meaning changed.  But think of a vocation as what way are you working on becoming good.  There have traditionally been 4 vocations that mankind can be called to. Notice called to… it isn’t something you try to do… it is something built in you and you have to discover what that is. It takes time and it takes effort and it takes possibly the most difficult thing, learning about your true self.  Again acknowledging all of the icky bad stuff…. Yet at the same time uncovering some really cool things about yourself too.

Of course it would be helpful to know the four vocations first. They are:

Married – By far the vast majority of people are made for this type of life. Man and women together to bring each other love. Help the other on their journey and bring a proper environment for raising children. Obviously this is very important for the common good of the human race. Without new humans we really are not fulfilling our commandment from God. A child who grows up with both a mother and a father in the same household do best as they continue journeying through life.   This is why discernment prior to marriage is so extremely important. Praying to God asking the right questions. This is a primary good, since it really is in the best interest of everyone involved. God knows what your vocation is and wants you to choose it for the fullness of happiness.

Single –  This is also a valid vocation. There are people that are made for the single life. They can do so much for many others. They have many people in their lives that will help and guide them along their journey and they are given the opportunity to help many people on their own pathways.

Religious – The religious life are the Nuns, brothers, friars in ordered life. These are particularly chosen by God to pray and live in group settings and pray and work for God’s will where they are. There are mendicant orders (begging orders) They live day to day helping out running soup kitchens or hospitals etc. There are orders with strong devotion to various parts of the faith, be it the Eucharist, Heart of Mary, Heart of Jesus etc.  There are teaching orders, there are orders that work in hospitals. As you may remember the Here I am Lord where there are hundreds of religious representing their orders for both information and helping others to discern their individual vocations

Ordained – And there are the ordained. These are the priests, deacons and Bishops.  They are specifically chosen to lead a community. They give their lives up for the good of God.  They offer themselves up for the parish community or in the case of Bishops the entire diocesan group. In the case of Saint Patrick 4500 families have officially joined, however the pastor and priests are responsible for the spiritual lives of each and every resident within their assigned area.  Yes, even those not affiliated. It is a huge responsibility. But each group has its own charisms and each individual has his own focus.  All working in union with the Bishop who is responsible for each person in the diocese, again not just Catholics.  But should anyone need assistance (physically or spiritually) they should receive that help.

Okay so that is a little background. The point of all of this is that we ALL have chosen a religious life.  There is nothing that any of us do, that isn’t religious in nature.  We have an inbred sense to return and be with our creator.  We hurt so much when we lose a mother or a father for this very reason. These are the people who love you, nurture, you and make you who you are.  How much more do we want to be with the ultimate in creator? We all go through various stages. We are dependent upon mother and father.. we feel our oats and rebel against them in our teens. We recognize our faults and come back to them in our early adult years… we recognize that the God our parents and grandparents hopefully taught us about is real and we begin to try to learn more.  Life starts to get busy, job, children, many things get put on the backburner (for many God is included) … Then as things begin to settle down we begin to reflect on the important things…

This is the “normal” cycle of modern life.  Today there are a myriad of distractions that interfere with us reflecting on the important things. But eventually we all will do that. We recognize that we are going to die and what is our point?  In years past the answer was very clear, the answer was taught from day one and was shown day in and day out. But as of late, people are not knowing these basic things.  In our Western culture we are given so very much. We live affluent lives. We have food and clothing available. It appears that mankind is in charge of everything. We delude ourselves into thinking that “I can do it”. This is emphasized in each commercial. it each sporting event, in the workplace etc.

But those first few chapters, of the first of 73 books, in what we call the Bible pretty much tells the story.  God created this world for man and his goodness. He gave them everything they needed. He put minimal restrictions on them which would keep them safe. And the goal is an ongoing relationship of love between each individual man and his Creator.  A relationship with God, is freedom and love. It brings fullness and meaning to our life. This is why each person has a religious “vocation” that is simply as the Baltimore Catechism says that “God made me to know Him, to love Him, and to serve Him in this world, and to be happy with Him for ever in heaven.”   No better answer to the question than that.

Well, okay there has been a recount and my interpretation of Question # 10 of Part Duex has been refined. SO we will attempt again to answer the question

  1. What made you choose a religious path in life?

 

Okay so as it has been explained to me it was more of a personal request as opposed to a theological question (Of which much of what I did answer did impact the actual question. So some of this may be a repeat, but that is good… it is information that you should know.

 

There are so many individual moments in anyone’s life that to recount them all and their effects would be to say the least tedious. But I realize that there are things in my life that in particular the two of you, have not experienced. People you have not known, and a culture that would be a foreign to you as moving to Siberia.

 

So bear with me on some of this. Much has to do with people you did not know, or get to know well. Perceptions of individuals who were known for many years who for you were very short A more adult knowledge versus child knowledge.  These people include obviously Dad, all 4 grandparents, numerous brothers and sisters, 2 uncles, a great aunt, probably 2 teachers from high school, and more I will remember along the way.

In addition, there was a culture that is so vastly different from today, a culture that is probably the most oppressive in the history of the world. It is claimed to be freedom, but it isn’t it is a slavery probably worse than any African American (strike that to understand the culture one has to use the proper words) worse than any negro could have dealt with.  Just the word probably sends shivers down your back.  But we had a unique perspective “back in the day” We used words that actually described what we were talking about. Political correctness did not exist. We used the English language, didn’t make things up. 

Then through all of this is the teaching, influences that each of these had

Probably the easiest thing to do is to discuss those things as I remember them and probably through that you will probably get the way I thought about them, and culturally how it was thought of at the time, and you will be able to compare and contrast them within your own culture… for culture is a personal influence on each of us, living in a monastery will have a must different outcome than being in suburban Texas or a ghetto in New York.

One item that is of note that all of my influences grew up in the ghetto.  Now when you think of ghetto, you image the South side or west side poor neighborhoods filled with violence and crime.  That isn’t the ghetto that I speak of. The ghetto back in the turn of the century to 1940’s were the individual parts of the city where a particular group of people lived.  You remember vestiges of it in the Polish neighborhoods along Milwaukee, but it was far more than that.  These ghetto areas were basically a homogeneous mass of people.  German Catholics, Lithuanian Lutherans, Irish Catholics, English Anglicans, etc.    For generations people lived in these ghettos and thrived.   They were born, grew up, married, had their own kids, grew older, and died All going through life with the sacraments close at hand.   Great grandparents Mazurowski went to Saint Barbara’s from the time they arrived in the United States. Their kids went to St. Barbara’s. There was no reason to leave everything you needed was right there. Your job, your church, the stores. If you wanted a little adventure you headed out on the streetcar or bus.   This was life for numerous generations here as well as those who lived in Poland, Germany, England etc.  The world was filled with these ghettos of likeminded, homogeneous groups.  Their main focal point for everything, learning of the world and other issues was the Church.  Your identity was the Parish you went to.  You were identified simply by “I go to … Everyone knew who you were and what you were. And this worked well for hundreds of years, pretty much through the breakdown of the serfdom times of the middle ages.

It sounds so foreign now, and one has to ask how there was ever any advances if everyone was the same and lived together.   Simple in that atmosphere you did have a much better teaching and learning culture. All of the great scientific minds that we can think of came out of that culture. Science was taught and it was taught well, technology was embraced, simply because there was no technology. And it made life easier. Mendel, Einstein, came out of the Ghettos in Europe, so did most of the greatest scientists. But the world we live in now is quite different.

All of a sudden people are now living in the suburbs, no longer homogeneous, but quite the opposite Heterogeneousness is ever where. Where it was forbidden to interact in any way with someone of another religion, the practicality of this became virtually impossible.

Now what is it that changed all of this? The seeds of this had been planted earlier, but the main impetus that changed all of this was World War II.  The services didn’t much care who was this religion or that religion… they wanted people to fight together (yes there was still racial non-integration) but if you were white you fought together.  And they did… and lo and behold they began to talk to each other and get to know each other.  Hell they trusted their lives to everyone else in that platoon, etc.  For this very reason the seeds were being sown for racial integration at the same time., but that would take another 20 years or so.

Once the GI’s came home they no longer wanted to live in the ghetto… they had seen the big cities, they had been cramped up in the foxholes etc… they wanted more room and the GI bill helped them to buy homes, get educated and more They would be able to get a foot up for their kids. And these “kids” are the ones that influenced me the greatest.  They remembered well though the schooling they got and how well it served them. They had seen the effects on kids going to the government run schools.  So the schooling stayed as it had been… same model being transferred to the outlying areas.  Except one thing. Because of the larger areas being covered there began instead of Catholic or Lutheran nuns teaching the need was for lay teachers.  This started to mean tuition.  But it was a small price to pay for the kids

Dad was the beneficiary of this environment even though he was still in the city.  John Miller was the beneficiary off this.  The education system, was excellent. Up to this time no better education system had been put together. (Perhaps still has not) Grandma and Grandpa all were educated in the city ghetto structure and once finished HS went off to work.  In general boys went to school, became altar boys by about age 7 (right after first communion) they progressed through the ranks. They all when to an all- boys school. Dad and Joe went to St. Alphonusus and then DePaul Academy.  Boys started to choose seminary, technical school, college etc. 

The girls were brought up traditionally. They went to an all-girls school, learning how to teach, read, run a household etc. Choosing between High School or Religious life. Mom went to Madonna, and on to working life at a bank Sister Judy Nickels went to the convent and became a nun, eventually ending up in Saint Charles.  Learning how to teach, read, run a household etc. Choosing between High School or Religious life.

Uncle John stayed at Saint Rita’s to eventually become ordained. Dorothy joined the School Sisters of Notre Dame.  Dad was a product of this ghetto religious school system. Uncle Joe was a product of this system.   Mom was part of the new system being cobbled together out in the suburbs.

Overall the culture was traditional.  Man and woman got together preferable due to mutual attraction, though still not necessary completely). The expectation at the time was marriage by the time one was in their early 20’s. Women began getting education for office work allowing for advances in technology. The jobs that were available for hire were changing, moving slowly to the “white collar” jobs which were much more lucrative and much less taxing on the human body.

The reason I go into depth about the time and the culture for the generation before me, is that these are the people who were to influence me and guide me. Great examples to follow, and it was pretty obvious who it was you wanted to follow/ learn from. you felt it. This was the expectation you had from the ghetto schooling.  You wanted the next generation to know more, move the ball farther. It was for the common good that you taught everywhere what was right and shunned that which was bad. And there was an objective right and wrong. There still is it is just not focused on. It is ignored. But that is another generation.

 

There are a number of things that come with religious life. First you have to know it exists.  You have to be accepting that it exists, and it must be placed in a priority. I have always been a religiously based person. It has always been there; however, it was not placed in priority. In each of our hearts there is a pull towards the transcendent… towards God. I remember many times that the transcendent came busting through directly into my world.  I closed my eyes.  I sat in the pew at St. Patrick’s asking what about the priesthood… good question, but the ears were closed to the answer.  We are all predisposed to talking with and having a relationship with God… this should be as close as a Father has talks and discussions with his son or daughter.  I loved the conversations that I had with Dad. The myriad of things he could talk about and had learned amazed me.  Unfortunately, though you can’t relate to that. If I say to you that God loves you like a Father, it falls completely flat… because you simply have not lived with a father. The reality is he died before you could have those conversations.  You had father-figures, perhaps me, perhaps other fathers… but not John J. Stowell.  So when the three of us hear “In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit” there is a vast dichotomy between what I hear and comprehend and what you do.

So it is with Dad that start. As mentioned above he was born into the Northside Polish catholic ghetto.  Northside version. Going to St. Alphonsus. Keep in mind all that is written here is perceptions.  Are they an accurate depiction of the full man, woman or child? No we keep much closed off to others and many things from your own kids.  But the main thing I remember about Dad was his deep faith.  One item that made a very strong change in me was his love for the Bible. Did he read it all the time, no (not that I am aware of at least) However, when going through my teenage years and mocking this or that He came down on me very hard. For him (as it rightly should be) the Bible was the word of God and not something to be made fun of.  Lesson learned and stuck. There was something more to this book than a bunch of words and stories. This was about when I was 16 and things started to fall into place. I was beginning to get an understanding about my father.  He was an altar boy at St. Alphonsus. This means a vastly different thing than an altar server that we grew up with.  This was pretty much step one on the pathway of becoming a priest.  And it really was a type of formation.  One learned about the Mass and what it meant. You memorized the various parts (in Latin).  This was the summit of all existence. You were right there as the bread and wine was changed physically into the body and blood of Christ.  For those who served as an Altar Boy it was at that time step one in the seminary if you will. You learned and you learned very well.   By the time you were older, you had a very good education about the Church and you had pretty much established what vocation you had in life.  It is still a very powerful and insightful vocational training ground. Because you are so close and are responsible for so much.

This carried on throughout his life, these values, the values of his mother and father, trickled down. I hear in my mind, our grandfather, “Jack” saying Do the right thing… at the … while being chorused by his father and his grandfather, at the right time, because it is the right thing to do.  Yes, perhaps this is his (and all the others) epitaph to us. A call to righteousness. As I get older, I think it is that call. The call put into him by all of his teachers, all of his experiences all of his time.  Righteousness.  While all of the other great things about Dad are still there, as I am now older and understand much more, this call to righteousness is one large reason I headed the way that I have.  One can never separate the impact that one’s parents have on you.  We perceive things that are parents do, perhaps unfairly or heap too much praise on them. But they (assuming both stick around) have gifts which they pass on… A parent’s job is very very simple… Raising kids is not simple… dealing with the culture they grow up in is not simple…. But their ultimate job as parents is not either of those…. It is to get their children into heaven.   They have to show the way of righteousness.

Now this brings up the point of teachers. I had a set of teachers some very good… some perhaps filling a role they had to fill. High school is obviously an impressionable age. John Miller was an English Literature teacher. He was a product of that same ghetto upbringing.  I know very little of his life… other than he taught at HEHS in 1982-1983 school year. Okay so what is this about?  Well first he was an excellent teacher. My love of English Literature was nurtured by him.  But you may ask how I know he was a product of the Catholic ghetto? Simple… he did something that would be absolutely unheard of now. We were talking about word origins and their meaning. And he brought up two things that have stuck with me now close to 40 years later. One of the words he put up on the blackboard (yea it was that long ago) was Amen.   We talked about the word and that it is a promise of a promise. “So be it” or “It is true” Even back then it was few and far between when we heard something religious…. But then he followed up with it another important lesson… We must learn that the Latin mass had in it the words Dominium Vobiscum (The Lord be with you) … and the response is Et cum spiritu tuo (and with your spirit) … so we also learned that day the etCum Spiri 220 was also God’s phone number…. Okay a silly joke which probably doesn’t stand up too well since the Latin Mass is not known as well now… but it stuck with me… that you could bring your faith life into the “real” world.    I look back after 40 years and I know he is a product of the Catholic ghetto in Chicago… He was probably an altar server also… but at the time… I loved the whole fact that here was someone I could relate to as a Catholic.  He loved his Catholicism enough to share it with his students… not in a preaching way, but obviously if he talked to us about these things, they were important to him. Looking back, I recognize now that God, Catholicism, faith has always been a part of me.  I have always had a part of me being happiest and at peace when I am/was at Church.

It is an amazing thing as I look back on my life. Church / God/ Catholicism has always been at the heart of my life. Some of the earliest memories I have are with Both grandma and grandpa Mays. Neither of you knew grandpa, you both remember grandma, but even with that you were young when she died. There were two people that loved their relationship with Jesus. They were taught back in the early 1900’s at Catholic schools.  They may not have had the formal schooling that you and I had, Math, science, etc. etc. but at the time that really was not very important. You generally finished 8th grade and then you went to work in the factory. School was a place to learn the basics of life. How to read, how to write and basic things that you were going to need to live.   One of those was, and still is life within the church.

The Church was the central hub of life in those days. Things were going well you celebrated at Church and gave of your excesses. Things were going bad, you came to church and received of a neighbors excess.   Birthdates, name dates, all kinds of celebrations. Social programs all were through the church. Needed food, water, clothing, repairs to the house, etcetera you went to the Church.  It was this way for close to 2000 years.  Now neither one of the families they grew up in would be considered rich, but they were not hurting.  As you probably remember their fathers died in their 20’s leaving them fatherless and a widow for a mother. How in the world could this work… each of the families had 7 kids, no father that could work and no federally funded governmental programs?

Forward the clock to 2010 or so… I became a Knight of Columbus, because of the charity work, the solidarity etc.  But one of the things I found out was why the Knights of Columbus was started. Back in 1878 Father Michael McGivney began the Knights because he saw too many families, where the father died young and the family was just left on their own.  This was on the east coast in the coal areas where we know today the problems with coal mining, but then Black Lung disease (and other accompanying diseases) was not known. The fathers were just dying young and the families were suffering.   We he thought of a way to protect the families. The father could join the order of Knights and put a small portion of their earnings, and should something happen to him, this plan would pay out a lump sum.  In effect what we know as Life insurance today.   So in Chicago there was the Polish Union which based upon this model. I can be relatively sure that both the Mazurowski and the Szura families had this protection. Both side of the families owned outright their homes before the 1930 census which on the wages that were being paid at the time, would have been unheard of.

So none of them were hurting financially, but they got on with their lives, did what they had to do, learned what they learned, but at all times stayed close to God.  I was able to live part of that life out with them. Numerous times I stayed over at Grandma and grandpa Mays’ house when I was younger. There was no discussion about what I was going to do on Sunday morning. I am sure I whined but I went and it was wonderful. But looking back I see that they put everything that the church taught into their daily lives. How she made sandwiches, how He worked so hard. When there were major issues in the family (and there were a few I remember well) They applied all that they learned to the particular situation. They were Christ to those they met.  They weren’t perfect… they had their issues… but it’s evident to me just how much they believed and how much faith they had.  Whether it be Mike’s divorce, David’s death issues with Mom and Dad. They reacted (externally at least) with Hope and love of Jesus.  They comforted me at times when I needed it. I certainly was not part of the conversations, but the love they have for Mom and the love in which they tried to help.  They never had to face the specific issues of the 1970’s and 80’s in any previous times… but they were able to take the lessons they learned and apply them.  This is how I remember them and how they influenced me greatly.  The times the 3 of us had at that back room table, at the pew at Saints Peter and Paul. The stain glass, the sanctuary the love that was always there. (Not to mention the sacraments served there such as Mom’s first communion, confirmation, marriage, confession, my baptism)

Marriage is so very different than what I thought when I first got married. But I think that is true of all married couples. One starts out imagining peace, wonder and all of the amazing things that we will do together. That is the way our culture brings us to think about marriage. That is why unfortunately today anything goes. But the reality of it is that no things don’t go smoothly, things are not always rosy. But it is the greatest thing I could do.  My wife and I work together to bring what God wants us to bring into the world. We did not have children, but after discernment and struggle together we found a pathway in which the two of us could work our way through life answering God’s call.

When we got married I was worried about things that didn’t really need to be worried about. I knew in my gut that whoever I was going to marry, she was going to need to be Catholic. I had seen far too many people not bring faith (no matter how primitively thought of) into the relationship and when it does get brought up, there is the clash of titans.  I had my own thoughts prejudices, etc. going in. I had it in my mind that the “old” mass was better so I wanted as much as possible in Latin.  That made things the old mass for me… I had no clue.  At the time I blamed Vatican II for us not going to Church that much and all sorts of other things.  At the time I would not have expressed it that way… but this is a reflection of sorts. Now what I wanted in reality was beautiful music at “my” wedding. You just cannot help yourself when you are first getting married… no matter how much it is said. the “we” doesn’t come to reality until later. There is a big difference between “me and her” and “we” Thankfully both Thea and I had seen conflict in marriage and that at the end of the day love for the other wins out. Strangely it is at times through conflict that love grows closer.

So our wedding was a magical time in my life. And really the first time I learned much of anything about our Catholic religion. Sitting down with Father Oldershaw and Father Bart Winters was another time of learning.  I realize that at each time of crisis in my life there was a priest there. When grandpa died, grandma Stowell The priests were there tending to what needed to be taken care f. Even our cousin… this was a sad time, but there was a joy about him. When dad died, there was Father Sakowicz.  I learned something each time I had any direct contact with a priest.  I remember being in the hospital room with dad after he died and tried in my own spiritually childlike way asking God to forgive him all of his sins and take him into your hands.  It was something I felt should be done.  It was sort of an entry point into being head man of the family… you do what you do to help and to serve.

The nice thing was being exposed to church life in some small ways. Our pre Cana retreat, ironically n Rockford… was very informative. Thea and I were looking at life from a good outlook. We knew life wasn’t going to be perfect, we had learned that over our lives. But together it would be so much better. I cannot imagine going through some of this stuff without her… It would be impossible and probably I would have never given it a try without her.  Unfortunately, marriage has taken a backseat in today’s culture. It is sad to see… But we, as a culture, let it get away…. But back to it… the various calls that I have received throughout my life to be with the church and with God came through the sacraments. We may not have always done it “by the book” but the grace that came from those sacraments gave us both so much to work with.

 

Jesus manifestation in my life.

One day I was sitting in Church during Mass and praying. In those days during the intentions I went through my litany of people I prayed for. Generally, it was Thea, mom, Jeff, Cindy, Dad, Joe, Grandparents Mays, grandparents Stowell. I sometimes remembered David sometime not… depending on the experience of the week others may have popped in too… but generally this was, and to a great extent still is the basis for my current prayer. Well on this one particular day as I was praying I thought about grandma and grandpa a bit more than usual. There had been an announcement on Adult confirmation.  The realization of how happy my grandmother (in particular) would be for me getting confirmed.  This was pretty much my spiritual high point at this time of my life.  I knew, what I had already known and knew I should confirm that knowledge that this was the truth and it made sense to do something about it. (I had been drawn y that announcement for a couple of times earlier. but didn’t act on it). I could sit for the rest of my life vacillating and or give excuses, but it was a time for action. I signed up, went to classes, asked Thea to sponsor me.  The beauty of that day for me was outside of anything I had felt.  They say the Holy Spirit opens up all its gifts for you at Confirmation.  Great gifts of wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and wonderment of the Lord. It was like a flood upon me that set me a bit straighter. And opened my heart to listen more to god and allow the spirit to direct me a bit more.  The bigger thing was the desire to learn was enkindled.

 

Day at Mundelein

One thing that I have learned when dealing with the Creator of the entire universe. humility had better be in your package of thoughts.  You just can’t be smarter that the omniscient, more powerful than the omnipotent so just when you think you have it all in hand a dose of humility must be given to one.  I had read a number of books. I had listened to mother Angelica, I heard the sermons and homilies, I should think about formal training. I mean sure I had gone to a few Bible studies and learned about the bible. So one day there was a Conference over at Mundelein Seminary. It was about relating the Bible and the Mass. One of the big draws was that it was being held by Scott Hah, who I hold in high esteem. I had read his books and found them insightful but also down to earth.

It was a beautiful spring day and oh the mass and subsequent Liturgy of the hours was so beautiful. To hear a mass done in Gregorian chant followed by the Prayers of the church done again in Gregorian chant is just an amazing thing to hear.  I guess at this point it was transforming to me that English could be a beautiful language in which to hear the Mass. It was one of the few times I have heard the Mass done as it was meant to be. The entire congregation actively participating in the most Holy Mass. I learned a bit about singing from the director (which was his specialty) and I have tried to apply those things as best as I can.

Then we walked over to the lecture hall… walking into the seminary hall was wonderful. I was to learn quite a number of things that day. One of which was I had a long way to go before I could think about going to classes like this. And also while there are quite a number of brilliant scholars in the church, there are also quite a few nutcases… oops I mean interesting personae.  There was a great talk on how the architecture of the church developed over the years, as well as lectures on how the mass was set-up. The functions and mysteries that are playing out throughout the mass.  These were all very interesting and I could follow some of it. Some of the deeper aspects were new and hadn’t run across before. Then a nice lady began to talk about the letter to the Hebrews. Now this is what I came for… Study about actual books of the Bible. I could really get into this. I had a pretty good understanding of Scriptures after all….  Well just a few seconds after she said hello, I had the stunning recognition that I had absolutely no idea what she was talking about. She could have been speaking Portuguese.  “Pros Hebrios, the mystogogy of the resurrection…  And all around me the younger priests, nuns, and others listening intently, understanding this stuff.  As I said before God wants us to be humble and sometimes he has to show us in our faces.  I knew very quickly that I needed to learn an awful lot before I could ever think about a class like this again.

 

Ministry formation/ Diaconate

I had during this period gone to my Cursillo weekend and that really set me on fire for wanting to learn more, there was a small faith group that got together in Virgil. Father Perfecto led the group and his calmness and patience really stuck with me. Again another interaction with a priest that has made a big influence on me. About 6 months later I read an interesting item in the bulletin. Something about a ministry formation program.  Reading through the announcement, it seemed to be an opportunity to learn things about the Church, the bible.   I went to the orientation meeting and it sounded really good learning about various things about the Church and everything surrounded with it.  At that point I could not in any way shape or form described it to anyone (I know because someone asked and I actually couldn’t explain it. I babbled but couldn’t explain it)

Ministry formation is just what it says. If forms you, almost a molding process, giving all of the pertinent information to run a ministry in the Church. There is the Biblical part. The teaching part, the dogmas and doctrine. There is the human part, dealing with others…. But probably the most important part was the human part… of understanding yourself.   Now this part of it scares guys…and rightly so. it is tough to look at yourself and recognize what a “shlub” you really are.   Girls have an easier time with this, I think because they do it all the time.  I began with the idea that I would hate this… and that probably affected the outcome, but still I recognized that hmm looking at myself… the real self was not that horrible. I had lots of flaws more so than anyone might ever realize but recognizing them I could address them and work on them.  Overall there were many good things too… I think this is the same for all of us… deep down there are some real ugly spots there, but there are some very beautiful ones too… the rest are generally plain and ordinary.   Now I say this is important, because honestly most people do not ever get to this step, they accept themselves for who they are and feel there is either no way to or no reason to change.  But in going through these steps we recognize those things that may irritate others or hold ourselves back. So we work hard to change somethings.  Personality traits, you just live with, but learned behaviors can be changed.

All of this, plus past events, my constant love of God began forming something a bit new.  A new creation if you will. Even though God was truly at the center of my heart, for many years I was a product of my culture. Thinking I am a man of God knowing so much. I can be more productive on a Sunday morning by doing things shopping or whatever.  By this I am not talking of the days of drinking or even running around America Online until 2 in the morning.   But it all played into it. Focus on the self… don’t worry about the other and what you do to them.  But the conformation, the classes, the self-realization all played a part in hatching this quote new me, unquote. But the reality is this is the real me.  This is the me that God created in Mom’s womb a product of the love of mom and dad with the overriding love of God the Father.

So now I am 18 months away (God willing) from ordination.  Whatever ills I may have committed, whatever problems I may have cause, whatever love I may have ignored, I can do nothing about. I can reflect and repent. I recognize that God has always been at the center of my life. I learn all sorts of facts and Various forms of discipline. I have learned experience of Me. a 51-year-old married man raised by two parents living in the suburbs of Chicago. Any one of those things change, there is a complete different me. However, at the core there is still the great love of God and my love of Him allows me to follow the pathway that he offers me. I will learn more. I will teach more. I will answer questions I will ask more questions than I answer I hope.  I will pass on the extremely great news of Jesus Christ. Who died for our sins and conquered death and rose from the dead.  The pathway to Heaven is open for all people. There is no greater love than what we are told and what we are taught in the life, death and resurrection of Christ Jesus. This is what we are here for. To learn, to love, and to enjoy every friggin moment of time. And I am far from perfect in that… but I am trying… I am working on it. 

I have to stop here because we are at the present. What will happen in 2 minutes…? I cannot answer. All of what I wrote could mean nothing in the face of new commitments or opportunities.   Thomas Aquinas spent a good portion of his life writing the Summa Theological answering questions about God and life etcetera. It is an impressive product of many years of work. And when he had finished his master work… he said, it is like a bag of straw compared with God’s love.  God works with everyone, where they are at and with what they can handle.  My first answer to this question was a dodge since I wasn’t sure if you wanted what is above. Apparently you did. So I submit my bag of straw to you.  I take much from the “old” world. Of Chicago Ghettos and Suburban tranquility.  I have learned much from two Chicago natives who joined together to form our family. They loved each other., They loved God and we are the result. Before them were other Chicagoans, Bostonians, Polish natives.  Sprinkled in there were all sorts of people, experiences. All coming together to form each of us. We are all individuals within the image and likeness of God. But yet I do go back to my original answer in saying we are all meant to be religious in loving God. We are a set of experiences and relationships which our final focus should be Heaven.  God made us to be with him now and forever. Above is what I feel to be the relevant portions of my life. Though there are millions more.  It is an amazing array of details which make up this individual you see, perceive and hopefully love.

Questions About the Church

Well our first set of questions are quite varied and that is exactly what I was looking for. The priest collar is quite the interesting story. obviously like everything else it evolved. And you just might be surprised at the end where they came from. Now The short answer is that the main reason that they wear collars is to be easily identified if needed. It also gives them a reminder that they are to be in the world but not of the world. That is why the “uniform” is unique to clergy. As we go deeper into the question you just might be surprised at the end. So let’s take a look at the Church vestments and clerical wear.  As far as vestments (those cloths at mass) it basically breaks down into 3 periods.  1.) Up to about the year 400. 2.) from about 400 to 1300 and 3.) from 1300 up until now.

So the early period, when the Church was “underground” they knew who the leaders were and everyone wore the same type of thing. During the middle period, the Church obviously expanded and it became important to know who was the priest, the Bishop and the Deacons. So you started seeing fancier dress for the clergy. Mostly from the people giving them nicer things to wear.   Pretty much by 1300 what you see now is what you would have seen then.  Come of the individual pieces may have come and gone, but pretty much the same. In general, for the Roman Catholic Priest, the Cassock of long thin dress looking thing became the norm to wear as they were walking around in public. These cassocks had a high neck and usually scraped against the side of the neck causing chafing. The simple solution to this was to have a piece of cloth go underneath the cassock and over the neck so that the high collar would rub against this.  Being that dyes were extremely expensive, want to guess what color they were?

This is pretty much how a priest throughout the world looked from the middle ages on.  When the Protestant Reformation began around 1500 the new group decided to reform the dress as well. So more of a middle age shirt and pants with tie was the norm for Lutherans, Methodists etc. With the shirts they used to wear white ties (similar to you can picture Bill Hickok wearing in the old west). Around the same time as ties were falling out of fashion the Clergy in the Anglican church wanted to differentiate themselves from the secular world. So in 1840, what you are used to seeing today was actually invented first by a gentleman named Rev. Donald McLeod. 

He was in fact from the Church of Scotland (Presbyterian) He invented the detachable collar that just about all clergy uses today.

Now there are many many different styles but in general it is still used by clergy throughout the world.

To the right is his invention. This then led to further innovation to today perhaps used by a majority of clergy a simple plastic white collar that fits beneath the collar of the shirt.

And to the right are the slip in ones.

It is interesting as I have been seeing newer priests come out of the seminary many have begun going back to the traditional cassock and white cloth. I would imagine that these things go in cycles like all fashion.  But there you go… the Catholics priest collar that you are used to seeing was invented as recently as 1840 and by a Presbyterian!

Well This one I will try to dull the pain for by giving a bit more information on the “Bread” Before the Bread and wine are transubstantiated into the body, blood soul and divinity of Jesus Christ it is normal wine and what you called a “wafer “or host. Now there are basically two types of bread in the world leavened and unleavened.  I.e. that which has yeast and not have yeast, or other rising component.

Now the Eastern Catholic Churches generally use leavened bread for the Eucharist, while the Latin or western churches use unleavened bread. Both are made of just water and wheat flour. But why the difference? why not just use one type of bread? 

We live in a day of refrigeration and the ability to keep things fresh longer.  Go back   years and years ago what is the basic reason for the difference. Europe is cool and moist… Eastern areas are warm and dry.  If you take leavened bread and put it in France it is going to …. Get moldy and spoil.  If you take a piece of leavened bread on put it in Constantinople it is going to last much much longer. 

However Unleavened bread does not spoil. Hence the generally European areas of the Latin Church turned to what worked well there, while the Eastern churches work with what works best there.

Both fit the requirement of being wheat flour and water.  So the places that the Church sent missionaries to, brought with them unleavened bread. So Europe, North and South America, and the Far East have the unleavened bread or what is now “those perfect lil’ wafers”

Okay now for the answer to the question.

 
  

Okay there are numerous places to get them. And yes there are, for special occasions religious that still make them by hand and are used for special occasions.  For example, a special centennial or sesquicentennial etc. celebrations. There appears to be 2 or three manufacturers in the US but Cavanaugh appears to be the largest.

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Boy that’s a toughie. I guess so much depends on the context. Ones that I have been in or my favorite in the world.  Overall can’t get too much better than Notre Dame in Paris though Chartres is pretty good too.  But not actually being in them it would be tough to acclaim a favorite. There are some nice ones in Italy and Apparently Malta as well as the Slavic countries which you guys have actually been to.

So I will limit it to those I have actually been in.  Which well I guess I would have to go with Sts Peter and Paul in Naperville.  Obviously I was baptized there my parents were married there. And it was the one I was introduced to the faith (in what it actually meant to be a Catholic through my grandma and grandpa But that is probably biased based on all of that.

I have been in four Cathedrals that I remember. Chicago which is not in any way Gothic. There was Cincinnati not sure that it would hold up to a strict definition of gothic. Though obviously beautiful. St. Peters in Rockford.. also not Gothic which pretty much leaves me with one left which at least is Neo Gothic and that would be the Cathedral Basilica of the Immaculate Conception in Denver.

There is Holy Hill north of Milwaukee which is marvelous, as well as the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in LaCrosse. There also is St Alphonse in Lake view. This is my Fathers church. In Chicago.  Absolutely marvelous. The Cathedral Basilica of the Immaculate Conception is the furthest Gothic church I have been too and that has so much history as well as beauty.  It would be very tough to say my favorite of those. Keeping in mind all of them a gothic revival and truly not Gothic. From a colorful beauty I think I would go with LaCrosse… It is fairly new and its colors are vibrant and tell the stories they are supposed to tell.  Probably the Cathedral Basilica in Denver and Holy Hill are the ones that probably really stand out in my mind as truly Gothic in nature. Though obviously none of these go back to the 10th to 14th centuries.

Ever wonder what the names mean? Cathedral, Basilica, Parish etc.? Thanks to New Advent. Com for this great work.

  1. Cathedral: The chief church of a diocese, in which the bishop has his throne (cathedra) and close to which is his residence; it is, properly speaking, the bishop’s church, wherein he presides, teaches, and conducts worship for the whole Christian community. What properly constitutes a cathedral is its assignment by competent authority as the residence of the bishop in his hierarchical capacity, and the principal church of a diocese is naturally best adapted to this purpose. Such official designation is known as canonical erection and necessarily accompanies the formation of a new diocese.
  2. Basilica: A title assigned by formal concession or immemorial custom to certain more important churches, in virtue of which they enjoy privileges of an honorific character which are not always very clearly defined. Basilicas in this sense are divided into two classes, the greater or patriarchal, and the lesser, basilicas.
  1. Major: To the former class belong primarily those four great churches of Rome…which among other distinctions have a special “holy door” and to which a visit is always prescribed as one of the conditions for gaining the Roman Jubilee. They are also called patriarchal basilicas, seemingly as representative of the great ecclesiastical provinces of the world thus symbolically united in the heart of Christendom. They possess a papal throne and an altar at which none may say Mass except by the pope’s permission.
  2. Minor: The lesser basilicas are much more numerous, including nine or ten different churches in Rome, and a number of others, such as the Basilica of the Grotto at Lourdes, the votive Church of the Sacred Heart at Montmartre, the Church of Marienthal in Alsace, &c. There has been a pronounced tendency of late years to add to their number. Besides conferring a certain precedence before other churches (not, however, before the cathedral of any locality), include the right of the conopaeum, the bell, and the cappa magna. The conopaeum is a sort of umbrella (also called papilio, sinicchio, etc.), which together with the bell is carried processionally at the head of the clergy on state occasions. The cappa magna is worn by the canons or members of the collegiate chapter, if seculars, when assisting at Office. The form of the conopaeum, which is of red and yellow silk, is well shown in the arms of the cardinal camerlengo over the cross keys.
  1. Chapel: The basic definition of a Chapel is an informal Church or a room containing a small side altar. There are many different kinds of Chapels. See the NewAdvent page on Chapels for more detail.
  2. Oratory: As a general term, Oratory signifies a place of prayer, but technically it means a structure other than a parish church, set aside by ecclesiastical authority for prayer and the celebration of Mass. In the Latin Church oratories are classed as:
  1. Public: Canonically erected by the bishop and are perpetually dedicated to the Divine service. They must have an entrance and exit from the public road. Priests who celebrate Mass in public oratories must conform to the office proper to those oratories, whether secular or regular. If, however, the calendar of an oratory permits a votive Mass to be said, the visiting priest may celebrate in conformity with his own diocesan or regular calendar.
  2. Semipublic: Those which, though erected in a private building, are destined for the use of a community. Such are the oratories of seminaries, pious congregations, colleges, hospitals, prisons, and such institutions. If, however, there be several oratories in one house, it is only the one in which the Blessed Sacrament is preserved that has the privileges of a semipublic oratory. All semipublic oratories (which class technically includes the private chapel of a bishop) are on the same footing as public oratories in regard to the celebration of Mass.
  3. Private: Those erected in private houses for the convenience of some person or family by an indult of the Holy See. They can be erected only by permission of the pope. Oratories in private houses date from Apostolic times when the Sacred Mysteries could not be publicly celebrated owing to the persecutions. Private oratories are conceded by the Holy See only on account of bodily infirmity, or difficulty of access to a public church or as a reward for services done to the Holy See or to the Catholic cause. The grant of a private oratory may be temporary or for the life of the grantee, according to the nature of the cause that is adduced.
  1. Parish Church: A Church under the authority of a priest legitimately appointed to secure in virtue of his office for the faithful dwelling therein, the helps of religion. It must have besides the liturgical equipment necessary for Divine worship, a baptismal font (exception is occasionally made in favour of a cathedral or a mother-church; hence in the Middle Ages parish churches were often called baptismal churches), a confessional, and a cemetery. According to canon law, every church should have a stable income, especially land revenues, sufficient to insure not only the Divine service but also the support of its clergy.
  2. Crypt: An underground church, generally built among the dead. At first, crypts were sometimes as deep sunk as the cubicula of the catacombs themselves. Or they were but partly above ground, and were lighted by small windows placed in their side walls. Occasionally their floor was but little below the surface of the ground.

Amazing that there are that many types of churches and I lost count of the number of chapels that were listed.

The primary reason for this is, all of the attaché cases that are used by the Musicians are identical and each one has different music so it is always a crapshoot as to which songs are going to be picked up each week……

Now that is just silly!

The liturgical songs that are used really set the mood for the entire mass. There are millions of settings that have been used and are currently being used. Obviously each part of the mass is the same, however, it goes much deeper than is the music in major or minor scale. Also how does the music and the readings work together. Is there a special feast for the day? In general Advent is more somber as we repent and await the coming of our Lord. So you will notice a more somber mood to the music.  However, on the 3rd week of Advent the day known as Gaudete Sunday the music will change… why? Well Gaudete means rejoice…tough to rejoice in a somber music setting. So the music settings change to reflect the rejoicing a Christ is just about here! (At least it should but let’s face it there are many not so good music directors out there.)

In some churches each mass is identical, while in others there is a special setting for each mass. A mass for children will have a different setting than a requiem mass. I pulled up a website that has a number of settings (npm.org) and it has “Mass of Joy and Peace, Heritage Mass, Mass of a joyful heart. These are ones that had been written by composers starting with the letter A.    There are many many many settings for different instruments, different keys, different feels, yet all for the same Mass.

Variety is the spice of life and while the actual words of the mass are eternal and prayers to God the music should help bring us closer to the sanctuary being Heaven on Earth. But we are human beings… sometimes it works sometimes not so much. The important thing is to be at Mass being as close as possible with our God and our home.

Well I can only speak toward a few of the churches.  As you may have noticed when we were growing up, there was in town one Catholic Church, One Lutheran, One Methodist, and maybe a couple “bible” churches and perhaps a 7th Day Adventist and maybe an Evangelical Church.  Virtually everyone that lived in the town wen to one of these mostly the mainline churches. Let us look at that same town 30 years later. Maybe 2 Catholic Churches, the Lutheran Church, The Methodist, the 7th Day Adventist church has consolidated out of town the Bible Church is out in the peripheries and then there are 75 Evangelical churches run by separate pastors.  How did this happen?

Well in 1986, Pastor John had a nice congregation of about 1500 people. Now one thing about Evangelical Churches they are not bound by tradition or bible teachings. Their main focus sure is teaching about God, but because their ability to survive is totally dependent upon those 1500 congregates they are really bound to those 5% that have the real money.  Guess who gets to make the teaching of the Church? Those 5%. And if they don’t like the pastor… so then there were two Evangelical churches one with 1000 and the other with 500… These two proclaim the life of Jesus as their Lord and savior, but disagree about this thing or that…. Then humans being human think that this pastor is wrong… maybe one of the congregates got their mail order pastorate degree and there were three Evangelical churches… etc etc So now there are 75 different Evangelical churches each with 20 people in it.

For these churches their live or die based on very simply their popularity. Some stick with orthodox teaching, some take an Anabaptist (a sub division of Christianity as far as teaching) view others pick and choose, and others just make it up. Obviously, some of these ministers have the ability to speak and speak very well. Back in the 1980’s There was a “development” called the Prosperity Gospel. It basically boils down to if you have money and are prosperous then God obviously loves you. (in some ways this is a reshaped view of certain Jewish thought from 2500 years ago) This theology obviously is very popular amongst the upper-class evangelical groups. As a result, of course they show their love of Jesus by giving large donations to show how much Jesus loves them. This type of “gospel” was used by many of the TV Evangelists back when I was in my twenties and is typified by Joel Osteen today.

So there is a vast difference in how the churches are organized which in turn effects how the money that is donated is used.  As far as I know all churches are set up as 501(c)3 corporations.   These must meet rules and regulations established by the IRS. This basically makes the churches tax-exempt. There are a number of rules that churches must adhere in order to remain tax-exempt. In theory by being tax exempt they are using any money they receive to take care of the common good, which the government cannot address.

So that is a basic background to the question (who would have thought a question on the Church would involve the IRS huh?) So let’s get to it. The mainstream churches (Catholic, Lutheran, Methodist i.e. the traditional churches) in general handle things the following way. The money is donated to their care, they pay for the daily expenses electricity, water etc. They keep a small checking account to pay for things that come up (Annual picnic, emergency need maybe someone lost everything in a fire and needs blankets etc.) The remaining money goes to their particular main organization. For the Catholic Church it goes to the diocese. The other mainstream Churches have a similar structure. So from the diocese level they   obviously pay their offices, the workers, the priests, the healthcare, pensions etc. etc. The Bishop will then determine based on his desires and prayer how the rest of the money is used. Each diocese generally has a Catholic Charities, a small amount goes to support the USCCB and some towards “Peter’s Pense” account (This is an account which goes to Rome that the Pope determines who in the world gets a portion of that) So basically with the exception of a small checking account All of the money is given out for charitable causes (food, shelter, clothing, education, etc.)   This is pretty much the same concept with the other mainline churches.

The independent evangelical churches there is the vast gamut of how the monies are used.  Many live frugally and establish a long-term project like A soup kitchen, clothing exchange, etc. In all cases, the money paid for the priests, preachers, etc. are paid.  Interestingly these are not employees of the Diocese or conference or Church they are independent contractors. So as part of their contract determines their pay. But because they are independent contractors they have to pay their own social security tax, any other federal, state, and local mandated taxes. They have to also look ahead to retirement etc.

So how much do some make? Well the mainstream churches pretty much start off their priests, pastors, ministers out around $18,000     and it goes from there.  They each publish what they pay so the people know what their money is being used for. Now on the other extreme is the evangelical churches. From what I saw there was really no limits to what they would spend for and for whom.  A pastor could determine the best way to discuss who should get the money for this or that is to head to the fanciest restaurant and discuss it with whom he wanted to. The amount of salary could be based on how much their weekly services brought in. In the end you have the most expensive house in the United States being owned and lived in by Joel Olsteen while the aforementioned John the preacher is on the state rolls for food stamps.  The IRS rules are very vague as far as how a church may spend its money. Other than they must be of a charitable nature.  The person in charge of the 501(c)3 makes that determination. Should the IRS question it, they get audited like anyone else.

It always looks a bit fishy when you have a public figure flaunting his/her money around when they are in charge of a charitable fund, hence these megachurch ministers never last very long. Someone always comes along who can speak a bit better and can attract the people with the money. So it was with Ernest Angeley, Jim and Tammy Fae, Pat Robertson, the list goes on.  Then there are the ones that last throughout their lives and beyond, such as Billy Graham.  He did what he did for 60-70 years and while he never wanted he never made a great deal of money. He started colleges, funded grants, scholarships etc.  The vast majority of pastors/ ministers etc. are this way. They have a modest little house or apartment and find which type of thing they wish to focus on. And they do that.

The mainstream churches are larger and tend to have a more universal focus. They take care of the needy, be it clothing, food etc. etc. They find their calling to take care of all issues.  It basically comes down to being open to the Holy Spirit. The Bishops have a very keen understanding of real life because they lived it themselves and have talked to thousands of people in his parish or diocese and usually can determine what direction should be taken. Two very different models of what to do with the money they collect.

Very interesting question.  Short answer In the Catholic Church, once a person is ordained as a priest they can never have that removed from them.  It is a permanent sacrament like baptism. Once you are baptized (using the Trinitarian form of I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit or words representing that) one is baptized forever.  We think of it as an actual change to the body and soul. It is the same thing with ordination. An actual physical and metaphysical change has occurred to the person.

So that being said, If I become a Deacon I will be required to take at least 25 hours’ worth of classes CPE’s etc.  to keep my knowledge fresh and moving. One of the greatest things I found about dealing with God is that I can never know God, his Son, His bride, his life completely. There is always something new to learn, I am always changing hopefully moving forward.  It is the same with Priests and other religious.  Learning, growing, experiencing new tings keeps you vibrant and keeps you growing. Now there are times when someone might go the wrong way and start preaching something heretical and damaging to the faith. There is a few steps that are used to help. Obviously the first line is the Pastor then there is a Vicar of Clergy and eventually things may get up to the bishop. Each ordained minister has what are called “faculties” There is the faculty to preach, to marry others, to hear confessions, to hold Mass etc.  These faculties are handed out to those worthy by that Monarch talked about earlier, the Bishop. The priests and deacons are working in his name and have given their pledge of obedience. Well that which can be given out can be taken back if need be. A Bishop can take away the faculties or anyone under his jurisdiction that has them. Remember I said that the Pope would have to ask permission to hold a mass? Well in reality the Bishop would be giving faculties to another bishop to have a mass. 

So a priest or Deacon that goes rogue, if you will, can be controlled. As the person has taken an oath to serve the Bishop. He can disagree, he can think the Bishop is wrong, etc. This is why one of the first things that was taught to us almost the first day of classes was The oath of chastity is a piece of cake compared with the oath of obedience. An ordained priest or Deacon vows obedience to the Bishop and all of his successors. Definitely not an easy thing to do at times.  But the Bishop is the Father of all in the diocese. He is like the Father in the story of the Prodigal son. There ever waiting for his son’s return. Always loving always waiting.

 It is with this love and patience that the Bishop helps to see the right path.

So the learning continuum goes on. But it is not so much a book learning but a people learning. A book can tell you to think about this or that. But it is putting those ideas in real life with another person that makes it be “learned”. For instance, I can read a book that says that hungry people will be grateful for food. But it is only in putting food in front of a hungry person that I will see the happiness, the fulfillment and the grace. It is also only in doing such a thing that I learn the humility involved in doing something like that. For me it is a matter of a few minutes of time for the person receiving the food it is their entire lifetime that is being extended. It is in this type of service, or the service of offering Mass, that really teaches.

I have been up on the altar once in the service of “Altar server” for a wedding renewal of vows. Yes, I did the proper steps… I brought the book to the priest when he needed it, I brought over the items for communion… but it was either the standing to the side or the kneeling which were the most insightful to me. It was at these points where I was praying, not the standard prayers of the Mass, but the prayers for the individuals involved, the wife, the husbands, the sons and daughters, grandchildren, great grandchildren. To pray to God that their needs both physically and spiritually are fulfilled, and knowing I could at that moment do something for each of them, taught me quite a bit about how little I am but how much can be done with God’s help through me.

The Vatican. The smallest country in the world. Here are some facts:

Vatican City State was founded following the signing of the Lateran Pacts between the Holy See and Italy on February 11th 1929. These were ratified on June 7th 1929. Its nature as a sovereign State distinct from the Holy See is universally recognized under international law.

The population of Vatican City is about 800 people, of whom over 450 have Vatican citizenship, while the rest have permission to reside there, either temporarily or permanently, without the benefit of citizenship.

About half of the Vatican’s citizens do not live inside Vatican City. Because of their occupations (mostly as diplomatic personnel), they live in different countries around the world. The conferral or loss of citizenship, authorization to live inside Vatican City and formalities for entering the territory, are governed by special regulations issued according to the Lateran Treaty.

Government

Sovereign (2017)

THE SUPREME PONTIFF FRANCIS

Bishop of Rome; Vicar of Jesus Christ; Successor of the Prince of the Apostles; Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church; Primate of Italy; Metropolitan Archbishop of the Province of Rome; Sovereign of the State of Vatican City; Servant of the Servants of God.

PRESIDENT
His Eminence Card. Giuseppe Bertello

GENERAL SECRETARY
S.E.R. Mons. Fernando VÉRGEZ ALZAGA, L.C.

The history of the Vatican is extremely interesting.  Going back to the 2nd century the area had the name Vatican. The current borders were established in 1929 at the Lateran Pact. This negotiations   established the current boundaries and independence of the Vatican as a City State between Pope Pius XI and King Victor Emmanuel III by Benito Mussolini.   Straight up data on that can be found at the Vatican website and there are all sorts of information on the web. As usual much of it is political or conspirical in nature, but there is some good information out there.

Okay so with this information one may ask okay so what’s the big deal. Well like everything with the church there are numerous layers to it. For the Vatican there is the City-State. In this it is not any different than Rome, Paris, Washington DC etc.  It is also the home country of the Pope, the Vicar of Christ.  This from the hierarchy of the Church it makes it the central hub of Christianity. Then there are the churches. There are 7 Churches within the Vatican along with 4 Chapels.  The most famous of these is St. Peter’s Basilica as a Church and the Sistine Chapel.

The history of St. Peter’s is very very interesting. A quick move over to St. Peter himself.  A priest on the radio brought me this idea and it does tend to make sense.  The person we know as St. Peter was a man named Simon Bar Jonah (Simon son of Jonah) picked by Jesus to head his church. We see that he was made this by basically two verses.

Matthew 16:18-19

And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church,* and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.

I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven.* Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

The idea that was brought to my attention is that the word in Greek for rock is “petros” so this is a bit of a play on words that Jesus used. “You are “Petros”, and upon this “petros” I will build my church”. So the idea is that His name was still Simon, but his Title was “rock” or Peter. In the same way as Pope Francis is currently the Rock who holds the position of Pope, Simon was the Rock or Peter. This is why Peter holds such a prominent place in Catholic Church. He was assigned the ministry of “Rock of the Church” by Jesus himself. And that ministry has been passed on 265 times to Pope Francis.

 A small church was built back in the 3rd or 4th century which legend had it was the burial place of St. Peter. A church was maintained for centuries and in the middle ages when the science of building had progressed a large Church was built with the latest in technology. This is the building you see on the news all of the time.  It took a long time to build. Plans apparently were started around 1450 under Pope Nicholas V and it was finished as we know it in 1626 under Pope Innocent X.

It is in reality a Church, a Museum and a burial crypt. The most famous of the chapels is the Sistine Chapel with much of the work there done by Michelangelo, but within the walls of St. Peters is some of the most important and beautiful artwork in the world. It is kept there for the sole purpose of keeping it safe for everyone in the world to see should they desire.

Okay so why is it so holy? Because it’s the Pope’s home church? No… believe it or not… this is not the Pope’s Church… That is actually St. John Lateran and it isn’t even in the Vatican itself… but out in Rome. East of the Vatican a couple of miles. 

Okay so still why is the Vatican so Holy? Simple…it is the actual burial place of St. Peter.  Back in the 1940 I believe there began a series of Archeological digs under the Vatican and lo and behold guess what they found directly below the altar. A burial place and it even had the transcription Here lies Peter. That which started as the traditional burial spot of Peter back in the 4th century by Constantine, was confirmed by modern scientific investigation.

So as the burial place of the first Pope, but also many people (obviously Christian) wanted to be buried near Peter. It was actually when they were “digging” a grave for someone that the crypt was discovered in the 1930’s which began the archeological dig.   But in addition to the burial place there is the museum part. Art from all ages and times are arrayed in the Vatican be saved from destruction by wars, fighting, desecration etc.

And it is the largest church in the world taking up the vast majority of the Vatican area. It is the place where the world can join (like any Catholic Church) anytime for Mass adoration etc.  St. Peter is literally now the “rock” that the Vatican is built upon.

Questions About Virtue & Sin

Nothing Yet

Questions About Scripture

This is a very interesting question. I am going to assume you are talking about the Magi that visit Jesus in the little stable in Bethlehem. Well I think we should actually take a look at what the passage says that may answer a few questions. And of course we are going to look to Luke because that is where Linus gets all his information from… hmm wait no Magi. just some lowly shepherds…  But the angels said some kewl things. hmm many of them the same as what Linus said… oh well let’s look elsewhere.

 

Oh good I found it in Matthew Chapter 2.  (whew!)

 

1 When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, in the days of King Herod,* behold, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, 2 saying, “Where is the newborn king of the Jews? We saw his star* at its rising and have come to do him homage.

 

Okay first off we have to do a bit of background here. I’ll give you the short version so you can read the 46 books of the Old Testament when you get a chance.  Okay Matthew is wring his Gospel to a Jewish audience. We infer this simply because he takes for granted that the people that hear this know the parts of Passover and the other Jewish festivals.  If he were writing to a non-Jewish audience, he would have to do much more explaining. Picture talking about Columbus day to someone born in Massachusetts versus someone from Latvia.  You can just get away with saying Columbus day to the American while the Latvia you would need to add many more details.

 

So what else do we know. Well it is pretty obvious that whoever these magi are they come from the east. The Hebrew  word that Matthew used was μάγοι. It generally meant Magician, Sorcerer, or wizard.  We can take clues from the text though that Matthew meant that they were astrologists. Look at the line “We saw his star.”

 

it was a common ancient belief that a new star appeared at the time of a ruler’s birth. Matthew also draws upon the Old Testament story of

 

 

Balaam, who had prophesied that “A star shall advance from Jacob” (Nm 24:17), though there the star means not an astral phenomenon but the king himself.   So the reference was doing double duty.

 

As mentioned earlier the Gospel was given to a Jewish audience.  Using the word magi and mentioning from the east pretty much solidified that they were not Jewish. Using magic (not the entertainment kind but the one where one tries to control the world and its parts, conjuring up the dead) etc. was (and still is) against the 1st Commandment. So we know that the magi are Gentile (Non Jewish). The significance of this is it is the first inkling that the Gentiles might be a part of this whole thing too.  For the Jewish people the Messiah was going to reinstate the Jewish Kingdom and make Israel # 1 again.   We have a good understanding today that Jesus came to save all of us… but that was certainly not the expectation by the Jews at that time.  Even when Paul explained it to people in the early 50’s the Jews couldn’t believe it because all their expectations were so different.

 

Note too as the story unfolds not only does a Gentile pay homage to Jesus the gifts given proclaim him as God.  While we are speaking of gifts, let’s take a quick glance at Psalm 72 Verse 10 and verse 15.  This is probably where the idea of the magi being kings came from. Also that there were three. note that nowhere in the Gospel passage does it say how many magi there were…

 

Psalms, chapter 72

10 May the kings of Tarshish and the islands* bring tribute,

the kings of Sheba and Seba offer gifts.h

 

15 Long may he live, receiving gold from Sheba,

prayed for without cease, blessed day by day.

 

So that is part of the story of the Magi.  The first inkling given to the Jews that the Saving power of the Messiah was not exclusively theirs. The Messiah in God’s view was for every human being that ever was, is now and ever will be… the same thing that the Catholic Church has taught for 2 millennia. Unfortunately, most people look and decide for themselves that there are people not worthy of being saved by God. It is something that we are all as human beings are guilty of at some time in our lives. God speaks to us in many ways through the Bible there is quite a lot that the magi can teach us about God’s ways. Isn’t that the most important significance?

 

Well two part questions kewl that gives me tons of time to talk.  It is interesting that without the coat, Moses would not have been there in the first place.  I in no way can tell the story better than what is in the Bible and I really really encourage you to read it. What is interesting the “story” of Joseph is in reality the first story like piece ever written? Huh?  Remember that all of the Bible was originally an oral /aural thing.  It wasn’t like heading to the printer to go get a new Bible. All of it was told generation to generation to generation. It was written down in the Temple and they had that but People didn’t go the Temple in Jerusalem every week. It was a trek what we would call today a pilgrimage. They went for the High Holy days where they would hear the story of Joseph get some of the details reminded but for the most part the young learned from their parents or elders and the story got transmitted throughout the people that way.

Okay this is going to be taxing but I need you to find a Bible (preferably a Bible with all 73 books in it) and actually open it up… yes it is okay that the binding gets used…. The first book is called Genesis… why? Because that is Greek for “In the beginning” Okay now skip over a few pages until you get to Chapter 37 now start reading it is only 20 pages or so..

Now look at the first part of the Bible. There is the story of Abraham. Look at the way the story is told of his life. Abram did A, B, C met Sarai, did D E F met the Trinity (yeah a lot of our Christian stuff is in the Old Testament… Jesus just wasn’t there to explain it yet… the people had to grow a bit more) Then etc. etc. No real detail, no color to the story… just fact A, Fact b, and Fact C…   . History explains some of this… but now go to the story of Joseph and his family. All of a sudden you are reading and you notice there is character development, there is more depth to each of them. Each of the characters are their own parts.   It is almost as if someone from today went back in time and wrote this saga.   It is amazing.  This is why I said that it was the first time this kind of story was done…  But because there is so much color and character to the story we know also that it is important and actual history (I use the word history biblically. We in the west have become accustomed to on October 1, 1939 the Germans invaded Poland. On October 2, 1939 France and England declared war et etc. etc. May 11, 1945 Dernitz unconditionally surrendered to the Allied parties.

That is not Biblical history.  We get the gist of what happened but don’t look for dates and don’t necessarily look for it in proper sequence.  The point of the story was much more important than this historical sequence.  For instance God made the world and all of its surroundings is much more important than on Day 1 He did this and on Day 2 He did that.  The point is that God made it out of nothing. 

Okay back to the story… so first off we see that Jacob loved Joseph and gave him what? A flowing Technicolor dream coat? Hmmm, well let’s see what the actual passage says….umm it was a long tunic….that wasn’t what I was expecting…

“You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know… morons.”   No no no.. I just couldn’t resist a good Mel Brooks reference!

Okay these were farmers… nothing too special with dress… whatever they had laying around was what they wore generally wraparounds very similar to today in the area.  So anything given that was special… well that bred guess what? That is right …contempt.  Jacob loved Joseph best… basically after being jerked around by Laban (his uncle who tricked Jacob into marrying Leah) he finally was able to marry the woman he loved in Rachel. And Joseph was their first son… hence why Jacob loved Joseph so much.  All these stories are pretty cool and perhaps some of the customs have changed a bit but you can imagine them happening in our family or anyone else’s. That is what made these stories be carried from generation to generation.

So the other brothers got jealous of Joseph and through some interesting events ended up in the prison of the Pharaoh of Egypt at the time…  Joseph was a dreamer (Can you think of another Joseph who dreamed something?) and eventually got out of prison because he was able to interpret the pharaoh’s dreams.  He eventually was, made what we would probably call Secretary of State for the king and saved Egypt (and the area) from a catastrophic famine…

During this time, he reunited with his Father and brothers (Yeah he got even with his brothers but in a good way since they all ended up together in Egypt).  And as the story says the Israelites lived in Egypt and multiplied and became a bigger clan throughout Egypt.   So much so that a later Pharaoh started to worry that the Israelites were so numerous they would take over the country… so he did what a king, I guess, does… Made them all slaves….

That is a truth you can generally count on. The longer one stays in power they will tend to become corrupt. But the people get what they ask for in the end. A king with unlimited power will not only become corrupt but they will become convinced that everyone is out to take away that power.  Heck we do that with God all the time.  Why wouldn’t we with a human beings?  So sometime later after the death of Joseph and the Pharaoh he served. A new Pharaoh (convinced that the Jews should be feared) enslaved them…. As the Jewish population continued to grow this Pharaoh went to his own version of the “final solution”.  He ordered that all of the male newborn children killed.   Nice guy huh?

This part of the Bible most people know about in one form or another.  It is really interesting after all of these years to read the story and pick out some of the details.  It adds so much to the basic story. Makes the people real instead of these guys from 3500 years ago. But the words Let my people go?   Well as most things there is more to the quotation actually. The words that were said was,

Then the LORD said to Moses: Go to Pharaoh and tell him: Thus says the LORD, the God of the Hebrews: Let my people go to serve me.

See God didn’t want the people free just to have them get trapped by another ruler or despot. He wanted them to serve Him.

But isn’t that the same thing? No simply because God is God and everything about him is good. There is a passage in the New Testament that says You cannot serve both God and Mammon. To serve God is to look toward the good and guided by the good. Mammon is the world and all of its lures and deceit since the fall… The point of the Exodus story is yes the particulars but also it is another step in God re-establishing his reign. Look at it this way God has made many covenants (kind of an oath) with mankind over the years but going to bigger and bigger groups.

Here is a listing in order of the covenants He has made

  •      Abraham – An individual
  •      Jacob and the 12 sons     – a family
  •      Each of the sons – a community
  •      Moses –  a gathering of communities
  •      Israel – an entire Nation
  •      The Catholic Church – the Entire World

Throughout all of this there standing in the way of each of us uniting with God is sin. When Adam and Eve let pride, envy, lying, etc. take over it messed up the entirety of our world. This ability to have sin such a part of our lives goes from generation to generation.  We know that these feelings and actions are wrong… not just because it is written somewhere but we see the results of it and can objectively say this is wrong.

Pride taken too far gives us a despot envy and hatred gives us something like Hitler… It goes on.  We have written or conveyed stories about the pains that sin has caused for all time. Yet we get backed into a corner and what do we do? We call out in fear and trepidation “It wasn’t me! It was John….”  John wasn’t even there but we blame him and try to shift the issue to someone else.

Now of course the question why doesn’t God just fix it?   It sounds strange at first but once you think about it and realize what it means what I am about to say does make sense.  The reason he doesn’t just “fix it” is because he loves us. Huh? Okay let me explain just a bit and hopefully it will make sense. When you love someone you want the best for them. In our case the best for anyone we love is for them to be in Heaven with God for eternity.  All of the material things homes, cars etc. mean nothing too much after you have passed on. The goal of a husband is to work to get his wife into Heaven when she dies and vice versa. A goal of a Mother and Father are to get their kids into Heaven when they die.  Let’s face it universally we all will die eventually. But will we be happy with God in Heaven for all eternity or not?  That is the ultimate question.

So if the ultimate expression of love is to want what is best for the other, the other part is that you cannot shackle the person you love. In other words, God cannot force you to do anything. In order for true love to happen the person must choose freely to love God.  Let’s bring it down to something perhaps a bit easier to see.  A man and a woman are dating.  But everywhere they go, he is the one dictating where they go and he grabs her by the arm and never let’s go… in effect forcing her to go to restaurant A and then dance hall B.  She is in effect totally his slave.  That certainly isn’t love.

God could make it that we do things his way… but would we not in reality then be His slave? So in love, God allows us to make the decisions. He gave us the rules we need to live by happily, but He allows us to freely choose what we will do. Sometimes we will choose to do His will… other times we will choose our will. When we do our own will… it is called sin, because God’s will is always for the best and always in love. When we choose our will, it is for us and generally selfish.

So basically if God were to “fix it” so there was no sin… we would not be able to love Him freely we would just be puppets. I don’t want that for anyone that I would love.  And if that sounds strange to you… You will never guess What God did to show his ultimate love for you and me and every other human being that ever was, is now and will be.   It was no puppet show but an extreme showing of love and devotion to His people.

Did they ever let His people go?

Oh most certainly his people are free. 

The world just doesn’t understand it yet though. They keep trying to enslave us with this ad or that ad. They try to sway our thinking with this candidate or that candidate. They try to distract us with this game or that game.

But yes… After crossing the Red Sea,

after the grumbling against God,

after asking for a King,

after the conquering of Israel by Assyria,

after the conquering and Exile by Babylon,

After the Exile and destruction of the Solomon temple,

After becoming part of the Greek and then Roman empires…

They were set free from Sin and death. Their Savior came to Earth and showed true love and showed the ultimate and the lengths of gift that God would go to show love to His people. 

They nailed Him to a cross and was killed.

But that wasn’t the end….